|

USD/JPY steadies as Middle East tensions offset softer yields

  • Safe-haven demand tied to Strait of Hormuz risk keeps the US Dollar supported.
  • Falling long-tenure US Treasury yields cap upside momentum, keeping gains in check.
  • BoJ’s cautious stance continues to weigh on the Yen, sustaining upside bias.

The USD/JPY climbed near the 159.30 price region on Wednesday, consolidating around recent highs as markets digest fresh developments in the Middle East and shift monetary policy expectations.

Recent headlines from the Middle East are once again influencing foreign exchange flows. Reports of new attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz have increased demand for safe-haven assets like the US Dollar (USD), helping it regain strength after earlier weakness. However, the market response has not been entirely consistent as alternating reports of ceasefires and ongoing uncertainty continue to cause sharp intraday fluctuations in sentiment.

Simultaneously, US Treasury yields have decreased, limiting the Greenback’s upward momentum and preventing a stronger breakout in the USD/JPY pair.

On the Japanese side, the Yen remains structurally weak. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) continues to express caution, with policymakers refraining from making any firm commitments to near-term rate hikes. This has delayed expectations for tightening and maintains favorable yield differentials for the US Dollar.

Chart Analysis USD/JPY

Short-term technical analysis:

On the four-hour chart, USD/JPY trades at 159.27. The pair holds a mild bullish bias as it trades above both the 20-period and 100-period Simple Moving Averages (SMAs), with the former at 159.01 and the latter at 159.15. This suggests an underlying bid on dips. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) around 55 leans slightly positive without signaling overbought conditions, hinting that buyers retain control but lack strong momentum for an immediate breakout.

On the topside, initial resistance is aligned at 159.37, where a horizontal barrier caps further gains in the near term. On the downside, immediate support is seen at 159.25, with additional layers of demand at 159.20 and near the 100-period SMA at 159.15, followed by 159.12 and the 20-period SMA at 159.01. A sustained break below this stacked support area would weaken the constructive tone, while a clear move above 159.37 would open the way for a more decisive bullish extension.

(The technical analysis of this story was written with the help of an AI tool.)

Author

Agustin Wazne

Agustin Wazne joined FXStreet as a Junior News Editor, focusing on Commodities and covering Majors.

More from Agustin Wazne
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD: Downward-sloping trendline near 1.3470 remains key barrier

The British pound faces selling pressure against its major currency peers, trading 0.1% lower at around 1.3420 against the US Dollar during the European trading session on Tuesday.

Euro clings to the bid bias above 1.1500

EUR/USD has picked up pace, reversing Monday’s decline and advancing past the 1.1500 barrier on Tuesday. In the meantime, hopes for a diplomatic solution to the Middle East crisis keep the US Dollar under modest downside pressure, helping spot in its recovery.

Ethereum holds steady below $1,900 as retail distribution rises
Ethereum (ETH) continued trading flat on Tuesday following modestly increasing exchange net flows and continued distribution across retail wallets. Ethereum on-chain data shows mixed sentiment across several wallet cohorts.
RBI set to keep interest rates unchanged as inflation risks persist

The Reserve Bank of India is set to announce its bi-monthly monetary policy decision on Wednesday at 10:00 AM IST (04:30 GMT), another meeting coming at a time when uncertainty remains high over the duration and economic fallout of the ongoing Middle East conflict.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.