|

USD: Fed politics skew downside risks – TD Securities

TD Securities strategists argue that Kevin Warsh’s path to the Fed chair and related independence concerns mostly point to a weaker Dollar in 2026. They map FX reactions across several Fed leadership scenarios, highlighting that Miran-related, politicized outcomes could generate the sharpest USD downside, while a status-quo extension for Powell would be moderately supportive for USD.

Fed scenarios mostly Dollar negative

"FX outcomes across the scenarios hinge on two factors: (1) expectations for the future policy path and (2) the extent to which concerns around Fed independence introduce additional risk premia. While the policy outlook will continue to be driven primarily by realized growth and inflation data, it is the second channel—credibility and independence—that differentiates FX performance across scenarios. Majority of the paths lead to some sort of bearish reaction in the dollar, which also supports our negative USD lean in 2026."

"Reaction hinges on policy expectations and Fed independence risks; most scenarios under Warsh-led transitions skew moderately USD negative, with a Miran-led transition and politicized outcome posing the greatest downside risk."

"In Scenarios 1 and 3 where Warsh takes over as Chair, moderate bull steepening for the Treasury yield curve would lead to moderately weaker USD. In these scenarios, potential logistics changes for the FOMC under the new chair and lingering questions over the Chair’s perceived independence relative to Powell are likely to weigh on the dollar. By contrast, Scenario 2a, which maintains the status quo would likely see bear flattening of the curve and be moderately bullish for the USD."

"Scenario 2b is the most political outcome and would likely lead to some degree of erosion to the credibility of the Fed as an apolitical and independent institution. At the same time, a more dovish Miran also joins the contention for the Fed Chair position. We would expect this scenario to lead to the most USD downside."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.