|

Oil: Central bank pain threshold and policy bias – TD Securities

TD Securities’ James Rossiter argues that major central banks have shifted their reaction functions after recent supply shocks, now placing greater emphasis on inflation and expectations than on growth. The report suggests that Oil around $150/bbl would mark the point where demand destruction dominates inflation concerns, potentially triggering rate cuts rather than hikes in response to further energy shocks.

Higher Oil reshapes central bank reaction

"Recurring supply-side shocks in the last decade or so saw central banks pivot toward "flexible inflation targeting" (FIT), which allowed them to shift focus toward downside growth risks and away from "transitory" inflation shocks (effectively, a shift in the relative weights in their loss function)."

"The sizeable inflation shock from Russia's invasion of Ukraine threw FIT out the window, and forced many central banks to rush to hike rates in 2022. Concurrent rapid fiscal support limited downside growth risks, meaning central banks could have looked through potential demand destruction and focused more on higher inflation. They did not."

"We think that central banks have learned their lesson, to a large degree. Policymakers are now likely to put relatively more weight on inflation and inflation expectations than growth in their loss functions."

"There is still a point for central banks at which demand destruction outweighs "transitory" inflation, justifying rate cuts instead of hikes in response to a supply shock. This point is further out now than it was in the last decade."

"We think oil at around $150/bbl is where demand destruction begins to outweigh inflation fears for central banks."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD holds above 1.3450 despite Mideast uncertainty

GBP/USD trades flat on the day above 1.3450 following the bearish action seen in the early European session on Thursday. Conflicting rhetoric from US and Iranian officials about a potential deal fuels market concerns and limits the pair's upside, while investors refrain from taking large positions ahead of Friday's critical Nonfarm Payrolls data from the US.

EUR/USD declines below 1.1550 on modest USD recovery

EUR/USD corrects lower after posting gains for two consecutive days and trades below 1.1550 in the second half of the day on Thursday. Markets stay wary about the prospects of a US-Iran peace deal and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, keeping the safe-haven USD underpinned and making it difficult for the pair to regain its traction.

How Wall Street rigs the game [Video]

In this week’s Live from the Vault, Andrew Maguire is joined by Peter Antico and Sean Stone to discuss the Paradigm of Money - an in-depth expose of financial market corruption, from naked shorting to the two-tier system that protects Wall Street.

Top Altcoins: Ripple, Cardano, and Solana vulnerable to deeper losses

Ripple, Cardano, and Solana are trading in the red on Thursday, facing downside pressure. The technical outlook for altcoins is bearish, as XRP risks falling below $1.00, ADA is eyeing the 50-day Exponential Moving Average at $0.1766, and SOL remains capped below a cluster of resistance levels.

AI defies the disinflationary playbook: Why lower oil prices might not be enough to cool core inflation
The global economic landscape has been fixated on the Middle East since the US-Iran war started in late February, reacting to significant changes in crude Oil prices and assessing how they could influence inflation dynamics and growth outlook.
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.