|

NZD/USD moves below 0.5850 amid increased risk aversion

  • NZD/USD weakens as risk aversion increases after fresh Israeli strikes hit Tehran.
  • Israel struck Iran despite Trump signaling a pause in energy attacks.
  • RBNZ Governor Breman warned that near-term inflation may rise due to energy shocks.

NZD/USD has pared its recent gains from the previous day, trading around 0.5830 during the Asian session on Tuesday. The pair depreciates as the US Dollar (USD) gains on increased risk aversion after the Israeli military said it had launched a fresh wave of strikes on Tehran.

Israel launched its latest strike on Iran despite US President Donald Trump signaling a pause in attacks on energy infrastructure following what he described as productive talks with Tehran. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) said operations would continue in line with government directives until further notice.

Moreover, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi denied any dialogue with Washington. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf also stated on Monday that no negotiations had taken place with the US. Meanwhile, senior military adviser Mohsen Rezaei said the conflict would continue until Iran receives full compensation for the damage incurred.

Reuters reported that San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly said that unless the Iran conflict eases quickly and the Fed can look through a temporary oil price spike, the outlook for interest rates remains uncertain.

Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) Governor Anna Breman noted that near-term inflation could rise due to energy shocks. While the central bank may look past temporary price spikes, she signaled that rate hikes could be required if inflation pressures become persistent.

New Zealand Dollar FAQs

The New Zealand Dollar (NZD), also known as the Kiwi, is a well-known traded currency among investors. Its value is broadly determined by the health of the New Zealand economy and the country’s central bank policy. Still, there are some unique particularities that also can make NZD move. The performance of the Chinese economy tends to move the Kiwi because China is New Zealand’s biggest trading partner. Bad news for the Chinese economy likely means less New Zealand exports to the country, hitting the economy and thus its currency. Another factor moving NZD is dairy prices as the dairy industry is New Zealand’s main export. High dairy prices boost export income, contributing positively to the economy and thus to the NZD.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) aims to achieve and maintain an inflation rate between 1% and 3% over the medium term, with a focus to keep it near the 2% mid-point. To this end, the bank sets an appropriate level of interest rates. When inflation is too high, the RBNZ will increase interest rates to cool the economy, but the move will also make bond yields higher, increasing investors’ appeal to invest in the country and thus boosting NZD. On the contrary, lower interest rates tend to weaken NZD. The so-called rate differential, or how rates in New Zealand are or are expected to be compared to the ones set by the US Federal Reserve, can also play a key role in moving the NZD/USD pair.

Macroeconomic data releases in New Zealand are key to assess the state of the economy and can impact the New Zealand Dollar’s (NZD) valuation. A strong economy, based on high economic growth, low unemployment and high confidence is good for NZD. High economic growth attracts foreign investment and may encourage the Reserve Bank of New Zealand to increase interest rates, if this economic strength comes together with elevated inflation. Conversely, if economic data is weak, NZD is likely to depreciate.

The New Zealand Dollar (NZD) tends to strengthen during risk-on periods, or when investors perceive that broader market risks are low and are optimistic about growth. This tends to lead to a more favorable outlook for commodities and so-called ‘commodity currencies’ such as the Kiwi. Conversely, NZD tends to weaken at times of market turbulence or economic uncertainty as investors tend to sell higher-risk assets and flee to the more-stable safe havens.

Author

Akhtar Faruqui

Akhtar Faruqui is a Forex Analyst based in New Delhi, India. With a keen eye for market trends and a passion for dissecting complex financial dynamics, he is dedicated to delivering accurate and insightful Forex news and analysis.

More from Akhtar Faruqui
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD drops toward 1.3400 on USD rebound

GBP/USD turns south on Friday and declines toward 1.3400 after posting impressive gains earlier in the week. Heightened Middle East tensions and rising global oil prices provide some support for the safe-haven US Dollar (USD) heading into the weekend and weighs on the pair.

EUR/USD comes under pressure, drops below 1.1500

EUR/USD retreats to the sub-1.1500 region on Friday, giving back some ground after a three-day rally. The pair’s decline comes amid a risk-averse market mood and renewed demand for the US Dollar ahead of the weekend.

Gold meets support just above $4,000

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.