|

Gold: Debasement trade faces policy headwinds – TD Securities

TD Securities’ Senior Commodity Strategist Daniel Ghali warns Gold is increasingly exposed as US 2-year yields break their downtrend and the macro backdrop shifts. He argues the debasement trade is crowded, money supply growth has normalized, rate markets see a prolonged pause, and Fed independence concerns are easing, leaving Gold vulnerable despite ongoing, but slowing, central bank demand.

Crowded debasement trade under pressure

"For the first time in more than a year, US2y yields have broken out of their downward trend, reflecting concerns surrounding Fed policy in a stagflationary shock."

"Gold is vulnerable: (1) The debasement trade has attracted immense participation, with our analysis of 13F filings suggesting that gold is no longer a fringe asset for institutional investors, given the most popular physically-backed gold ETF it is now roughly 67% as widely held by institutional investors as the most popular ETF in history. And yet, (2) money supply growth is trending at a pace that is more commensurate with the economy. (3) Rates markets are pricing in a more prolonged pause, with little room remaining to terminal. (4) Fed independence concerns have been alleviated by recent roadblocks to the Fed Chair confirmation process. (5) A Supreme Court ruling on the Lisa Cook case that is central to independence fears should be resolved within 2-3 months at most."

"The debasement trade is vulnerable, and while central bank buying activity provides an out for investors, the pace of official sector buying activity has declined over the last year. Importantly, the conflict in the Middle East will fuel further declines in official sector purchases, associated with the impact of the war on Gulf nations' economies."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD struggles above 1.1500 despite USD weakness

EUR/USD struggles with its recovery above 1.1500 in European trading on Monday, despite broad US Dollar weakness and improved risk sentiment. The USD loses traction following US President Trump's call off an attack on Iran and that talks between the two sides would happen on Monday. Traders will closely monitor the developments surrounding US-Iran negotiations and US ISM PMI data.

Gold's struggle with 21-day SMA extends ahead of US-Iran talks

Gold keeps its range around $4,050 early Monday, consolidating the previous decline. The US Dollar holds losses, fuelled by the USD/JPY slump and Mideast diplomacy hopes. Gold awaits a clear directional breakthrough, but sellers likely have the upper hand on the 1D chart.

Week ahead: US payrolls report and AI earnings to keep investors on edge

After the Fed decision, NFP report awaited for more rate hike clues. Employment also on the agenda in Canada and New Zealand. Chinese trade and Japanese wage data to be watched too. But Iran and AI headlines to remain in driver’s seat for risk sentiment.

Solana risks a steeper decline below $70 despite steady ETF inflows

Solana (SOL) is trading in the red, losing bullish momentum and remaining capped below its 50-day Exponential Moving Average at $75.68. SOL-focused Exchange Traded Funds show resilience with a monthly inflow of $14.62 million in July, while the near-term retail support wanes with the funding rate turning negative.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.