|

EUR/GBP: Upside risks seen amid UK politics – ING

Francesco Pesole at ING argues that Bank of England (BoE) tightening expectations, now close to European Central Bank (ECB) pricing, look excessive given the higher starting rate and less hawkish BoE stance. He sees scope for dovish repricing after today’s meeting, upside risks for EUR/GBP, and notes that United Kingdom (UK) political uncertainty could further weigh on Sterling in coming weeks.

BoE seen over-priced on tightening

"The Bank of England faced another round of hawkish repricing yesterday, with expectations for year-end now close to that of the ECB, around 80bp of tightening. We think this is excessive: the ECB’s starting point is 150bp lower, and policymakers in Frankfurt have been more hawkish than their BoE counterparts."

"Today’s BoE rate announcement could therefore prompt some dovish repricing in the curve and lift EUR/GBP as the ECB’s tone could instead keep tightening expectations relatively firmer in the EUR curve. We expect an 8-1 vote split in favour of a hold, with Chief Economist Huw Pill voting for a hike. "

"However, we don’t expect the Bank to add fresh clues about policy direction. The outside chance on the hawkish side is that Greene and Mann also vote for a hike, and on the dovish side that Governor Bailey pushes back against aggressive pricing."

"Politics remains the other central theme for sterling. Yesterday, comments by Labour Manchester mayor Andy Burnham hit both the gilt market and GBP. He is seen as a potential replacement for PM Keir Starmer, and widely considered a fiscal dove. Even yesterday, he reiterated that defence spending could be exempted from the fiscal rule, a very sensitive point for the bond market. "

"EUR/GBP faces upside risks from potential Labour underperformance and growing concerns about government stability. We still expect a move above 0.8700 in the near term."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD trims losses, back above 1.1500

EUR/USD picks up some pace and bouces off earlier lows, reclaiming the 1.1500 threshold and beyond at the end of the week. The pair’s modest pullback follows a persistent risk-averse market mood and renewed buying interest for the US Dollar.

Gold: The $4,000 mark holds the downside for now

Gold faces renewed selling pressure, falling sharply toweard the $4,000 mark per troy ounce as the US Dollar regains momentum. Escalating US-Iran tensions are keeping inflation concerns and expectations of further Fed rate hikes alive, weighing further on the yellow metal.

Bitcoin eyes 50-day EMA breakout, Ethereum consolidates, XRP steadies

Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Ripple trade near key technical levels on Friday as the broader cryptocurrency market pauses following last week's recovery. BTC is approaching the 50-day Exponential Moving Average while ETH continues to consolidate between two major EMAs.

Warsh needs to restore his reputation
We were glad to see our deeply negative reaction to the Warsh press conference was not some personal peculiarity. Just about everybody in the financial press felt the same way. The consensus is building it’s not the Fed in the dog-house but only Warsh. Today the WSJ changed it tune and blasted Warsh—"the honeymoon is already over..”
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.