|

Canada: Oil-driven inflation risks and growth trade-offs – RBC Economics

RBC Economics notes Canada’s Oil and gas sector is smaller than a decade ago but still important for GDP and exports. Higher Oil prices lift corporate profits and royalties but squeeze household purchasing power. The bank sees limited new investment, a largely neutral GDP impact, and only gradual, conditional inflation pass-through to broader Canadian prices.

Higher oil hits consumers but aids producers

"Higher energy costs curtail household spending, but other areas of the economy tied directly to energy production benefit. Corporate profits and government natural resource royalties rise alongside oil prices, and this is true for Canada and the U.S. as oil exporters."

"In Canada, the sector is smaller than a decade ago, but still accounts for 6.6% of gross domestic product and 15% of total goods exports in 2025."

"Outside of the direct effect on fuel prices, rising energy prices increase packaging expenses, and fertilizer prices among other critical business inputs across different sectors. However, these pressures take time to materialize. Oil prices must remain elevated for months rather than days or weeks to cascade through supply chains and influence business pricing decisions."

"These estimates don’t account for disinflationary pressures from reduced household demand for non-energy goods and services, which may result in a more muted inflation impact."

"Oil and gas investment in 2025 accounted for less than half of what it was in 2014 as a share of Canada’s GDP. The remaining investment in the sector is now largely devoted to maintaining existing production capacity, making it insensitive to oil price fluctuations."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with tops near 1.3470

GBP/USD manages to regain composure and challenge the area of daily highs around 1.3470 on Friday. Cable picks up pace despite marginal gains in the Greenback in a context of swelling geopolitical tensions and rising global oil prices.

EUR/USD struggles above 1.1500 despite USD weakness

EUR/USD struggles with its recovery above 1.1500 in European trading on Monday, despite broad US Dollar weakness and improved risk sentiment. The USD loses traction following US President Trump's call off an attack on Iran and that talks between the two sides would happen on Monday. Traders will closely monitor the developments surrounding US-Iran negotiations and US ISM PMI data.

Gold extends range play below $4,100 as rebounding USD meets receding Fed hike bets

Gold struggles to capitalize on a modest weekly bullish gap opening, and remains below the $4,100 mark heading into the European session. The US Dollar stages a modest recovery from its lowest level since June 17, which is seen capping the upside for the commodity. The upside for the USD, however, seems limited amid renewed hopes for a US-Iran peace deal and receding US Fed rate-hike expectations.

Week ahead: US payrolls report and AI earnings to keep investors on edge

After the Fed decision, NFP report awaited for more rate hike clues. Employment also on the agenda in Canada and New Zealand. Chinese trade and Japanese wage data to be watched too. But Iran and AI headlines to remain in driver’s seat for risk sentiment.

Solana risks a steeper decline below $70 despite steady ETF inflows

Solana (SOL) is trading in the red, losing bullish momentum and remaining capped below its 50-day Exponential Moving Average at $75.68. SOL-focused Exchange Traded Funds show resilience with a monthly inflow of $14.62 million in July, while the near-term retail support wanes with the funding rate turning negative.

9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.