|

BoE's Mann: Can't rely on risk premia to do work of policy, need to raise rates

Bank of England (BoE) policymaker Catherine Mann argued on Thursday that they can't rely on risk premia to do the work of monetary policy and added that they need to raise the bank rate, per Reuters.

BoE’s Mann flags need for higher rates despite tighter conditions

FXS Speechtracker assigns this speech a 9.4/10, notably above BoE’s Mann historic average of 8.1/10, signaling a stronger-than-usual policy signal. The insistence that the Bank of England “needs to raise bank rate” and cannot rely on risk premia to substitute for monetary tightening marks a clear hawkish shift, as tighter financial conditions are framed as problematic when driven by higher inflation and policy uncertainty premia rather than deliberate rate hikes.

By highlighting that tighter conditions offer “no comfort” if rooted in inflation risk and uncertainty, the remark underscores a preference for explicit Bank Rate increases over passive market-driven tightening, reinforcing hawkish sentiment for the Pound. The admission that the Bank of England may not have clearly articulated the reaction function to the Middle East shock, and that not publishing a baseline forecast in April likely added to uncertainty, suggests a desire to restore credibility and clarity, which typically supports expectations of more decisive future policy action.

Key takeaways

"Tighter financial conditions are no comfort when they reflect higher inflation risk premium, possibly also monetary policy uncertainty premium."

"BoE may not have clearly articulated its reaction function to Middle East shock in March, not publishing baseline forecast in April likely did not help either."

BoE FAQs

The Bank of England (BoE) decides monetary policy for the United Kingdom. Its primary goal is to achieve ‘price stability’, or a steady inflation rate of 2%. Its tool for achieving this is via the adjustment of base lending rates. The BoE sets the rate at which it lends to commercial banks and banks lend to each other, determining the level of interest rates in the economy overall. This also impacts the value of the Pound Sterling (GBP).

When inflation is above the Bank of England’s target it responds by raising interest rates, making it more expensive for people and businesses to access credit. This is positive for the Pound Sterling because higher interest rates make the UK a more attractive place for global investors to park their money. When inflation falls below target, it is a sign economic growth is slowing, and the BoE will consider lowering interest rates to cheapen credit in the hope businesses will borrow to invest in growth-generating projects – a negative for the Pound Sterling.

In extreme situations, the Bank of England can enact a policy called Quantitative Easing (QE). QE is the process by which the BoE substantially increases the flow of credit in a stuck financial system. QE is a last resort policy when lowering interest rates will not achieve the necessary result. The process of QE involves the BoE printing money to buy assets – usually government or AAA-rated corporate bonds – from banks and other financial institutions. QE usually results in a weaker Pound Sterling.

Quantitative tightening (QT) is the reverse of QE, enacted when the economy is strengthening and inflation starts rising. Whilst in QE the Bank of England (BoE) purchases government and corporate bonds from financial institutions to encourage them to lend; in QT, the BoE stops buying more bonds, and stops reinvesting the principal maturing on the bonds it already holds. It is usually positive for the Pound Sterling.

Author

Eren Sengezer

As an economist at heart, Eren Sengezer specializes in the assessment of the short-term and long-term impacts of macroeconomic data, central bank policies and political developments on financial assets.

More from Eren Sengezer
Share:

Editor's Picks

AUD/USD remains depressed near 0.6950 after RBA minutes

AUD/USD attracts follow-through selling during Tuesday’s Asian session, looking to extend the overnight rejection slide from 0.7000, or a two-week top, following the release of RBA meeting Minutes. The US Dollar retains a bullish undertone near its highest level since April 2025 as energy-driven inflation risks keep December Fed rate hike bets firmly on the table. Adding to this, geopolitical risks further underpin the safe-haven USD.

USD/JPY extends retreat below 158.50 as intervention risks loom

USD/JPY is dropping below 158.50 in the Asian session on Tuesday, snapping a two-day winning streak and pulling back from an over two-week top touched the previous day, despite Japan's soft PPI inflation print. Bulls turn cautious amid speculation that authorities will step in to prop up the Japanese Yen, which, in turn, weighs on the pair.

Gold comes under pressure near $4,160

Gold now gives away its initial gains and resumes its decline, revisiting the $4,160 region per troy ounce on Monday. The yellow metal’s pullback comes despite the fresh downward trend in the Greenback in combination with a mixed performance of US Treasury yields across the board and easing tensions on the geopolitical front.

Bitcoin rebounds despite cautious sentiment

Bitcoin rebounds over 2%, trading above $83,500 on Tuesday, recovering the previous day’s losses. Persistent geopolitical tensions and mixed signals continue to weigh on risk appetite, keeping investors cautious despite BTC’s recovery.

US – Midterm update: Democratic lead holds three weeks before election

With three weeks until the US midterm election on 3 November, prediction markets are more or less unchanged. Polymarket continues to put the probability of a Democratic sweep at 60-65%. The House is seen as a fairly safe Democratic win, with a probability of around 90%.

Has Bitcoin really escaped the macro forces it was built to fight?
Over 17 years ago, Satoshi Nakamoto designed Bitcoin (BTC) on the back of a global financial crisis as an alternative to the global monetary system outside the control of central banks, governments and traditional intermediaries. This raises a key question: has Bitcoin really become independent of the macroeconomic forces it was built to challenge?