|

United States: Long-run growth and China challenge – Commerzbank

Commerzbank’s Bernd Weidensteiner and Christoph Balz describe the United States as a long‑term growth success, driven by population gains, immigration and productivity, but now facing a serious challenge from China. They note that China already surpasses the US in GDP on a purchasing‑power‑parity basis, while the US still leads when measured at market exchange rates.

Strong US trend growth faces new rival

"For Americans, what matters is not so much the country’s ranking in international comparisons, but rather the trend in per capita economic output. And here, growth over the past 250 years has shown remarkable consistency. Real GDP per capita has grown at a long-term rate of about 1¾% per year."

"The most significant deviation from the trend occurred in the 1930s, when the economy slumped sharply during the Great Depression, but then returned relatively quickly to its previous trend."

"What does the future hold? With China, an economic power has emerged in the 21st century that can seriously challenge the U.S. for global economic leadership. In terms of purchasing power parity, China has been number one since 2016; by 2025, the Chinese economy was about one-third larger than the U.S. economy."

"However, when converted at market exchange rates, the U.S. still leads. Exchange rate trends (noting that the exchange rate for the renminbi, China’s currency, is by no means determined freely by the market but is influenced by the Chinese government) and the high nominal growth of the U.S. economy—driven by inflation—have widened the gap again in recent years."

"While this steady transformation was often painful, it was nonetheless an inevitable consequence of an economy that has marked the world’s “technological frontier” for nearly 150 years."

(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)

Author

FXStreet Insights Team

The FXStreet Insights Team is a group of journalists that handpicks selected market observations published by renowned experts. The content includes notes by commercial as well as additional insights by internal and external analysts.

More from FXStreet Insights Team
Share:

Editor's Picks

GBP/USD flirts with 1.3500 as USD finds fresh demand

GBP/USD is flatlining near the 1.3500 level the second half of the day on Tuesday, facing some pressure from renewed US Dollar demand as a safe-haven amid surging Oil prices and inflationary concerns. The focus now remains on the Middle East headlines, with Wednesday's US CPI data approaching as this week's key risk event.

EUR/USD stays below 1.1550 amid US-Iran impasse

EUR/USD struggles to gain any meaningful traction on Tuesday and trades marginally lower on the day below 1.1550. Traders seem hesitant to place aggressive bets and opt to wait for further developments surrounding the Middle East crisis and this week's release of the latest US inflation figures.

Gold off two-month highs, back below $4,400 amid surging Oil prices

Gold retreats from its highest level since June 5 at $4,435, touched earlier this Tuesday, and slides back below the $4,400 mark in European trading. Surging Oil prices, amid the US-Iran impasse on talks to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, rekindled inflation concerns, lending support to the US DOllar at the expense of the non-yielding bullion.

Crypto Today: Bitcoin and Ethereum consolidate, XRP dips as optimism for a US-Iran deal fades

Bitcoin (BTC) maintains a neutral outlook on Tuesday while testing support at $64,000. Investors appear to be sitting on the fence, awaiting a catalyst for a breakout above $65,000.

The inflation narrative is still way more important than the employment story
Core bonds sold off yesterday with the belly of the curve slightly underperforming in the US while European curves showed more of a bear flattening. Daily changes on the US curve varied between +4.7 bps (2-yr) and +6.4 bps (7-yr).
9-3: Is the Federal Reserve’s vote tally Warsh's new forward guidance?
The rate did not move. Neither did the statement, and that’s the more interesting fact. Set the July 29 Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) statement beside the one issued on June 17, and the two documents are identical apart from a single verb and a paragraph at the bottom naming three dissenters.