fxs_header_sponsor_anchor

Analysis

Is Europe going to retaliate?

Geopolitical/trade war

Trump claims he will apply new tariffs on Feb 1 on countries resisting a US takeover of Greenland. He attacked the European countries in NATO for sending troops and really just for free speech. Denmark and seven other European countries hit back with a statement that “tariff threats undermine transatlantic relations and risk a dangerous downward spiral.” The group pledged “to stand united and coordinated in our response.”

This is a double whammy because it’s not just the US against Europe but the US against NATO. Trump claims China and Russia could take over Greenland unless the US gets it, failing to recognize that if either did try, it would be NATO riding to the rescue. He’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer.

Trump perceives Europe as weak, indecisive, slow to respond. TreasSec Bessent came right out and called Europe “weak” on TV. But within 8 months of the April tariffs, Europe has been diversifying with deals with China, LatAN and some Asian countries. Canada made deals with China. Trump is squandering US power. On the economic front, countries are going around Washington instead of to it, knowing full well they will get only rudeness and a stunning absence of education and historical perspective. This is not going to end well. 

Is Europe going to retaliate? Some say yes, with a freeze on the trade deal between the EU and US last summer.  A full 27 EU countries sent ambassadors to Brussels yesterday with one agenda item the activation of “anti-coercion instrument” (nicknamed the bazooka) to impose limitations on US tech companies and/or other service providers with big business in Europe. So, do they have a spine? So far, the FT reports France is all for it.

Bloomberg reports the bazooka would hit €93 billion ($108 billion) of US goods imported into Europe. 

Outlook

Another week, another flood of White House vulgarity and bullying, another week of confusing and conflicting data. The important question is whether the Fed sees inflation as real and pressing, or can lean toward cuts because they would help the labor market (and housing). True, the labor market is in some trouble, but as we pointed out before, that’s at the margin (young people, uneducated and untrained people). They are a minority, if a substantial one.

Look at markets for the answer. The CME FedWatch tool shows that for the April meeting, 65.8% see rates the same as today. It was 34.6% a month ago when it looked like the sloppy labor market would rule. Even for the June meeting, those seeing no change in rates are 39.3%, up from only 15.9% a month ago. Those betting on Fed funds futures use a combination of data interpretation and mind reading.

On the mind-reading, the consensus is that Powell and the rest of the Fed voters will not back down and will continue to be data-dependent. Uncertainty just went up over the weekend as budget director Hassett disclosed Trump thinks he should stay where he is.

Meanwhile, the longer end of the yield curve is rising, including the key 10-year all the way to the 30-year. That discloses the inflation premium investors demand for expected future inflation, and consumer surveys can go pound sand. The rise could be partly due to Trump bellicosity, too. When will he declare selective default and refuse to pay interest in bills, notes and bonds held by Europeans?

Another market is sending out inflation distress cries—metals. All metals—precious and  industrial alike. Gold, silver, copper, and other metallic commodities. The word commodity itself is a message—bettors see the economy rip roaring, so demand for commodities reflects both expectations of real industrial demand as well as a modicum of safe haven vs. equities and the conventional (gold alone, bitcoin).

This week we could get any number of White House-driven initiatives, including the name of Mr. Powell’s replacement, the Supreme Court decision on whether tariffs were justified under the Emergency Powers Act, something more on Greenland.

And oh yes, the first revisions to Q3 GDP (Thursday) Also on Thursday, personal income and spending, along with the PCE inflation reading. It was 2.8% in Nov and little or no change is expected.

Forecast

The dollar remains being pushed by a robust economy and rising yields, and pulled by loss of confidence in the White House and the US generally for allowing these Trumpian travesties. There’s no doubt the next official reserve report will show another drop in dollar holdings.

At the same time, there’s no doubt that if the new Greenland tariffs and the bazooka measures become real, Europe is the economic loser.

Trump is going to the World Economic Forum in Switzerland this week. He will try to dominate the narrative and it may be interesting to see what pushback he gets from the business and finance bigshots. The WEO gets a lot of headlines but never results in any important change, although we may credit it for support for climate change measures  some 20 years ago (one vote among hundreds). 

We need to watch the stock market. If it falls off the cliff, it may—maybe, possibly—tamp down Trump to the point of meeting with the EU. Again. This is delay, not resolution, but better than the threatened outcomes.

We see little chance of the dollar getting sold off as the week progresses.

Long, Long Term Forecast: With reference to current political conditions, Martin Luther King: The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.


RELATED CONTENT

Loading ...



Copyright © 2025 FOREXSTREET S.L., All rights reserved.