fxs_header_sponsor_anchor

Analysis

The Dollar was checked

The Dollar was checked

The market just learned two things at once. The Federal Reserve is patient with inflation. Washington is not indifferent to the USD/JPY exchange rate.

Those are not minor footnotes. That is a shift in tone and posture.

The January minutes told us the Fed needs cleaner inflation prints before it blesses the two cuts money markets are still pricing. Employment risks have eased. Growth is not rolling over. The burden of proof has moved back to CPI. In other words, the Fed is not in a hurry to cut, but it is not back in hiking mode either. The bar to cut has shifted to lower inflation, not weaker growth.

The dollar initially appreciated on the hawkish tone. Headlines flirted with the idea that rates could go higher if inflation misbehaves. But when you strip out the noise, the signal is more balanced. The Fed is on hold, waiting for inflation to cooperate a little bit more. If it does, two cuts remain the base case. That is not a recipe for a sustained dollar melt-up. That is a recipe for rallies that fade.

Then came the real tell.

The New York Fed confirmed it checked USD/JPY levels on behalf of the US Treasury. In plain English, the referee walked onto the pitch and made sure the scoreboard was visible. That is rare. Foreign exchange markets rarely receive that kind of official stage lighting. The timing around 157 and the proximity to the psychological 160 line is no coincidence. It is choreography.

This was a message to the market that 157-160 is not just a number. It is a tripwire.

When Washington and Tokyo align on currency direction and monetary policy differentials narrow as the Fed eases and the Bank of Japan tightens, the USD/JPY asymmetry shifts. What was once a one-way carry escalator becomes a two-way risk asset. Asset managers will not ignore the bullish noise. The 156-158 zone will start to look less like a breakout platform and more like a sell-order distribution shelf.

In that context, the broader dollar revival story appears somewhat overstretched. The minutes did not deliver a structural hawkish shock. They delivered conditional patience. Those are not the same thing in FX trading

Near-term data can still stir the tape. A narrower trade deficit and solid GDP print could give the dollar a tactical bid. The DXY can drift toward 98 small + on momentum alone. But drift is not a trend. The reflex remains sell the rally, not chase the breakout. more so in USDJPY at this stage

Across the Atlantic, the equity tape is telling its own story. European benchmarks have quietly outperformed in dollar terms this year. The Euro Stoxx war machinery bid has outperformed the S&P 500 AI halo, and this is not merely an optical effect. Capital is testing alternatives because the US AI halo has been a risky bet this year; hence, Europe has been a safer harbour.

Yet, US TIC data still show a strong foreign appetite for US assets, but eurozone balance-of-payments flows have been supportive enough to keep the trade-weighted euro elevated. That flow undercurrent matters.

For the macro purists, the key point is this. Nothing in the FOMC minutes justifies EUR/USD trading anywhere near 1.1700. If anything, the mix of conditional Fed cuts and activist FX optics around USD/JPY argues against deep euro weakness, all things being equal. I really hate these market calls because there is no instant gratification and the big juice is better spent elsewhere, but the grind toward 1.19 into March remains entirely plausible.

The dollar has been running on narrative momentum. It is now encountering nuances in Washington policy. And when nuance meets short-term momentum, the market tends to check itself.

Just as the Fed checked USD/JPY.

The rally Wagon Rolls because Seoul refused to miss a beat

One thing global markets love almost as much as AI fear easing is a strong US economy humming in the background, because growth is the ultimate volatility suppressant. But this leg was not born in New York. It was reignited in Seoul.

Asia did not simply take a narrative baton from New York. South Korea grabbed it with both hands. When traders in Seoul returned from the Lunar New Year, they did not tiptoe in. They stormed the book like hungry desk heads who had just realized the market had moved three big figures while they were away, and they were not going to miss the next leg. This is not just another regional bounce. Korea is the leader in Asia in terms of technology beta. It is the clearest public expression of the AI capital expenditure cycle. When Korean equities rip to record highs and Samsung prints fresh all-time highs, that is not local noise. That is the AI complex clearing its throat and telling the world it is not yet done rewriting the technology trade map.

Global investors understand the signal. Korea is the other key green-light signal for AI. If that billboard is flashing new highs, the market reads it as confirmation that the AI trade was bruised, not broken. The extreme scare phase may be over. The capital cycle remains intact. The supply chain is alive. When Seoul runs, global macro funds take notice because Korea sits at the intersection of memory chips, foundry capacity and global demand. It is the pulse point.

US equity futures leaned higher in response, not explosively but with intent. Europe put on a flat-to-slightly-positive face, exactly how you behave when you like the direction. But when your markets don’t own any significant AI juice, you likely flock to names that do.

Nobody is declaring victory. Nobody is ringing a bell at the top of the stairs. The market is simply leaning forward in its chair, elbows on knees, eyes fixed on the screen.

This is not a euphoric breakout. It is a disciplined risk bid led by the most AI-sensitive market in Asia. When the leader of the pack accelerates, the rest do not argue. They follow.

And flows are the real center of gravity right now. The marginal buyer is still retail, in the US, in Asia, and likely soon in Europe, once the crowd decides it wants a seat at the AI table again. Institutions can talk about valuation discipline and second-order effects, but retail decides whether the bid has stamina because retail keeps pressing the button as long as the screen keeps rewarding them. That does not mean we are in an AI renaissance. It means the sector is clearing its throat, stepping back up to the microphone, and reminding everyone that as long as the global economy is not rolling over, the path of least resistance for the tape is higher. In this market, fundamentals light the candle, but flows keep it burning, and right now the air is still oxygen-rich.

What is more telling is how the so-called hedges behaved, because this cycle has been weird in a very modern way. Bitcoin firmed, which is the mood ring telling you the crowd is still willing to hold risk with a grin. Gold and silver also found bids, even after hawkish Fed minutes, and that is the part that would have sounded like a misprint in an old textbook. But it makes sense in a market that has turned gold into a portfolio airbag rather than an anti-equity weapon. Investors are not buying it to bet against stocks; they are buying it to stay long the upside while paying a premium for tail risk insurance, like wearing a seatbelt while still driving fast. When the Fed minutes refused to bless imminent cuts and the tape barely flinched, that was your tell that the rally is currently less about rates day to day and more about positioning and flows.

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.


RELATED CONTENT

Loading ...



Copyright © 2026 FOREXSTREET S.L., All rights reserved.