It’s a faulty extrapolation to see falling claims as a recovery indicator
|Outlook:
Any sparks of fear and anxiety over future inflation are premature and should get snuffed out with the arrival of buckets of cold water in the form of current data. Unfortunately, today’s unemployment claims may not be part of that. Expectations are for a drop in initial claims to 1.1 million in the latest reporting week. The number alone doesn’t tell the story, because job recovery that reduces claims is not the same thing as actual growth and worse, those not making claims are absent not because they have jobs, but rather because they have exhausted their ability to claim (or state offices are still backed up).
It’s faulty extrapolation to see falling claims as a recovery indicator. We still will have 21 straight weeks in which claims are over one million.
Besides, the loss of the extra $600 per week in benefits is going to start hitting real data, real soon. And loss of confidence in the federal government to deal with recovery needs should contribute to gloom. Economists are united in expecting personal consumption to fall, along with more job losses, a wave of evictions, etc. See the chart from 538.com. Underneath that chart is another from the Census Bureau on “housing uncertainty” (from the Daily Shot). Seven of the states where people didn’t pay July rent and are pretty sure they can’t pay August rent are Republican states. As noted above in the distribution of Covid-19 deaths, the South is heavily represented there, too. (So we have a bunch of rednecks who refuse to wear masks, becoming homeless and dying in droves, and these are the guys who have the guns. How long before we have another mass shooting?)
We see glimpses of desperation all over the place. One of them is the 100 million doses of vaccine the feds contracted with Moderna to produce. Moderna has never before produced a commercially viable vaccine. Early results look good—they got antibodies—but paying an unproven company $1.525 billion ($2.48 billion with all the incentives) is nothing short of reckless and desperate. We hope Moderna pulls it off but it’s not hard to see how a Harvard Business School class would judge this decision.
When it’s desperation driving risk-on, it’s not hard to see risk-off right around the next corner. This may be behind some of the dollar’s lingering appeal. We think the rise in yields should be short-lived; the market chooses to perceive inflationary risk but the Fed is adamant, and in the long run, the Fed rules.
Besides, the Fed’s economic analysis is deeper, wider and just plain better than the market’s, which is why we keep getting warnings from various Fed officials that we really, truly, honestly do need another stimulus/recovery spending package and right away, please. It’s not new to have divergence between the market viewpoint and the central bank viewpoint; the market often says the Fed is “behind the curve.” This is almost never true, but over the years the market has increasingly become better at twisting Fed arms. In a sense, current business guy Powell is a better Fed chief than the economists who preceded him because he uses only one hand at a time and sticks to his story. This is not to say Bernanke and Yellen were wusses, but they were perhaps overly willing to see alternative explanations and flaws in models. Look at all that time we wasted talking about the neutral rate, a hypothetical construct that never did anyone any good.
To return to the immediate subject, desperation, Bloomberg tries to make bricks from straw by cheering the Gilead announcement of cooperation with 40 companies around the world to produce enough remdesivir to treat 2 million people by year-end. Bloomberg says it’s practically heart-warming. But 2 million treatments? The world already has 20 million cases and the US, over 5 million. We fail to see how this mitigates desperation.
Where does all this leave us? When in doubt, fiddle with the chart. See the euro on a weekly basis. It has managed to retrace a near-perfect 62% of the downmove from Feb 2018. We normally expect a pullback from that level and then a moment of truth when players decide whether to take it to the moon (back to 1.2550) or to give up. Our view has been that a euro recovery could be based on pandemic response and faster economic recovery, but it’s a weak argument when all of Europe still has negative rates. In a nutshell, be careful shorting the dollar. It may have muscle for the wrong reasons—steroids—but it does have muscle, despite the millstone of Congress around its neck.
This is an excerpt from “The Rockefeller Morning Briefing,” which is far larger (about 10 pages). The Briefing has been published every day for over 25 years and represents experienced analysis and insight. The report offers deep background and is not intended to guide FX trading. Rockefeller produces other reports (in spot and futures) for trading purposes.
To get a two-week trial of the full reports plus traders advice for only $3.95. Click here!
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.