Analysis

US Housing: An Anemic path

Housing starts from US, the only piece of economic data for today, released earlier, presenting the slowest pace since May 2017.

US housing starts fell 0.3% to 1.139 mln in March, extending the 12.0% drop in February to 1.142 mln, and the January 1.273 mln. Single family starts remained weak, sliding 0.4% on top of the -19.0% previously. Multifamily starts were unchanged after rising 8.9%. Meanwhile, Building permits declined 1.7% to 1.269 mln following the 2.0% decline to 1.291 mln in February (revised from 1.296 mln). Starts were lower in 3 of the 4 regions, falling 17.6% in the Midwest, 7.2% in the South, -4.4% in the Northeast, while the West bounced 31.4% in the West.

This report was another indication of an anemic path for the housing sector in the US, for the remainder of the expansion. Yet, the financial market panic of December, combined with disruptions from hurricanes, fires, and harsh winter weather, has left a patch of reports that overstate weakness.

The market panic and ensuing Fed response has translated to a mortgage rate drop and an MBA purchase index bounce, as demand rises into the seasonally important spring housing season.

The Q1 MBA Purchase Index surge occurred alongside a pop in the new home sales figures, leaving gains of 8.2% in January and 4.9% in February to a 667k pace that marked an 11-month high, versus a 10-year high of 712k in November of 2017.

The existing and pending home sales figures have also climbed in Q1, though at a less impressive rate than the new home and mortgage data.  One characteristic of the current cycle is a reduced transaction rate for existing homes, which likely reflects a drop in speculative activity since the last recession’s collapse.

Meanwhile, Housing starts have run weak relative to permits since storm disruptions kicked-in last year, and some catch-up is expected for starts in the first half of 2019.

The late-2018 weakness in housing starts corresponded to late-2018 weakness in the monthly construction spending data for “new” residential construction as well, on top of a weakening pattern since a peak for this measure in May of 2018.

Residential construction, which combines new construction and home improvement, with real estate transactions activity presented a moderating growth path through 2018 that suggests lean 2019 growth as well.

We can now also factor in the impact of the drop-back in mortgage rates and heightened financing activity.

If we compare the current cyclical recovery in the real residential investment component of GDP to the recovery paths of the prior seven cycles, we find that the late-cycle slowing in housing sector growth is quite similar to the prior “long-cycle” seen through the 1990s, and is in line with historic behavior. A flat growth path for real residential construction late in a cycle can extend for years.

One remaining major component for the construction sector is public construction, and here we’ve seen huge 2019 gains of 5.7% in January and 3.6% in February. Though some give-back of these out-sized gains is likely, we expect firmness in public construction for the year as a whole.

Total construction spending, which combines residential, nonresidential, and public construction, but which leaves out mining structures, looks poised for a 3% clip in 2019 after a 4% pace in 2018 and a 5% rate in 2017. We still have a weak path for construction spending, though weakness in the various housing measures into the start of 2019 will be reversed to some degree into Q2, and gains in public and nonresidential construction will partly fill the void. Gains will fuel ongoing increases in construction employment and purchases of construction supplies.

In total, the anemic path is expected to continue  for housing through the remainder of the expansion. Yet, weakness through the turn of the year for the various housing measures has understated the trend, and we expect a bounce in most of these measures into the seasonally important spring housing season.

 

 

 

 

 

Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.


RELATED CONTENT

Loading ...



Copyright © 2024 FOREXSTREET S.L., All rights reserved.