Are European households Ricardian?
|Today’s deficits are tomorrow’s taxes. Therefore, it is logical for households to save rather than spend the public transfers they receive, since these are incurred through debt and will eventually need to be repaid.
Suspicions, but no proof
Although rational on paper, this “Ricardian” effect (named after the eminent English liberal thinker, David Ricardo) remains difficult to quantify in practice. Nevertheless, recent events in France seem to echo this theory. The ongoing discourse regarding the sustainability of public finances in general, and the pension system in particular, is prompting households to save at levels not seen in 45 years (18.9% of gross disposable income in the second quarter of 2025, according to INSEE). It remains to be seen whether this behaviour is a knee-jerk reaction to the current political instability or a reflection of a more enduring concern, extending beyond France, regarding the rising government debt.
To answer this question, it may be useful to compare the trends in savings with those of its traditional determinants, to ascertain whether any “Ricardian” behaviour is at play. However, the empirical analysis, shown in our graph and covering the last 25 years of the EMU (Economic and Monetary Union), provides no evidence of this. Statistically, changes in public accounts (as indicated by deficits or shifts in the debt ratio) do not significantly affect household savings, once disposable income, interest rates, and the unemployment rate (considered as a precautionary motive) are taken into account. This observation holds true for France and the euro area.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.