US: Neomercantilist shift on trade policy reshapes global blocs – Rabobank
|Rabobank’s Michael Every argues that America’s Maritime Action Plan (MAP) marks a decisive move away from rules-based free trade toward bloc-based neomercantilism. He highlights that higher US port fees and tariffs, combined with upstream alliances for critical minerals, are set to fragment global supply chains into US-centric and China-Russia-centric blocs, with inflationary and geopolitical consequences.
Port fees, tariffs and global fragmentation
"The MAP references the Section 301 investigation into China’s maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding sectors, deeming Beijing’s practices “unreasonable and burdensome.” Subsidies, state ownership, forced technology transfer, and predatory pricing have allowed China to capture over half the global market."
"If the US insists ever more of its maritime trade is carried via US-flagged and then US-built vessels, there could be major disruptions to global supply chains. As we saw in 2025, this can lead to market fears of an immediate shortage of appropriate ships being available, pushing up freight rates."
"Even if this can be ameliorated by working with allies, the MAP leads to one conclusion: ‘rules based’ free trade is over, and neomercantilism has replaced it. Port fees on top of US tariffs, on top of upstream alliances for critical minerals, will only accelerate global supply chain fragmentation towards two different economic blocs: a US-centric one with Korea/Japan (and Europe?) vs. a China-Russia-centric one."
"Another wrinkle is that US port fees on China were put on hold as part of the recent US-China trade détente. If the US is going to drop them now, it will likely see China reimpose its own counter-fees or WTO challenges, as well as potentially exerting economic --or even geopolitical--pressure in other ways."
(This article was created with the help of an Artificial Intelligence tool and reviewed by an editor.)
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.