China draws bottom line - Global Times
|Global Times reports that 'China on Sunday made clear that it would not give any ground on core issues of principle despite mounting pressure from US bullying on trade and technology and that it will "fight to the end" if forced, as officials issued a key document that harshly criticizes the US for repeatedly backtracking and jeopardising the trade talks.'
Key quotes
China's Position on the China-US Economic and Trade Consultations released by the State Council Information Office, offered China's most comprehensive response yet to US accusations since talks broke down last month and clearly draws China's bottom line for potential negotiations, analysts noted.
"China will not bow under pressure and will rise to any challenge coming its way," the document read, "China is open to negotiation, but will also fight to the end, if needed."
"The US has become so unreliable that we must draw our bottom line clearly. That way, if they can accept it, we can; if not, why waste time?" Tu told the Global Times on Sunday.
The white paper stated that China's "sovereignty and dignity must be respected, and any agreement reached by the two sides must be based on equality and mutual benefit. On major issues of principle, China will not back down."
Asked about the potential for a meeting, '(Xi/Trump),'at a press briefing about the white paper on Sunday, Wang Shouwen, a vice commerce minister, said he had no information to offer.
Wang said that China is open to talks but it must be based on mutual respect, mutual comprise and equality. "If we cannot achieve this, then there is no point for consultations; even if we talk, we won't be able to reach an executable and sustainable agreement," he said.
The white paper released Sunday also pushed back on US officials' accusations that China had backtracked during negotiations.
"The US government should bear the sole and entire responsibility for this severe setback," it stated, adding that "the US government's accusation of Chinese backtracking is totally groundless."
The document detailed how it was the US that backpedaled three times over the past year.
Even after China overcame difficulties to find pragmatic solutions to many issues raised by the US, it still wanted a yard after China offered an inch," said Wang, who is part of the Chinese negotiating team, noting that the US insisted on "unreasonable" demands, including terms that violate China's sovereignty.
"If the US thinks it can force China to make concessions through maximum pressure and by escalating the trade friction, that's absolutely impossible," he said.
"China will definitely not flinch under US pressure," Song Guoyou, director of Fudan University's Center for Economic Diplomacy, told the Global Times on Sunday, "If the US exerts more pressure, China will certainly take tougher countermeasures to retaliate."
Though the white paper did not mention any countermeasure, it signals that, if forced, China will take necessary countermeasures, including restricting rare earths export to the US, analysts said.
Asked whether China will restrict rare earths export to the US, Wang said that "it would be hard to accept" if some country uses products made of China's rare earths to contain China's development.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.