ECB: time for a strategic review–not monetary policy messages
|The December ECB meeting, which will be Lagarde's first meeting as chair, is set to focus on the strategic review. With forward guidance and new QE purchases already set for the coming months, no change in monetary policy is expected for the near future.
Markets are likely to trade sideways through the press conference. We doubt specific details of the strategic review will be announced but we hope for at least some scope. We do not expect a deadline to be announced.
We recommend Bund ASW wideners and periphery spread tightening as main ECB QE trades next year. We do not expect next week's meeting to ‘rock the boat'.
Strategic review – still within price stability
Lagarde's EP hearing on Monday did not include any views or guidance on what the review may entail. We welcome the exercise as the previous review took effect in 2003. We have heard from many GC members that they welcome the review, but very few have been specific on what it may entail. Only Holzmann (Austria) has voiced concretely what a review may entail. In his view, it should lead to a lowering of the inflation target to 1.5%.
Generally, we argue that there are two ways to do it: a short and brief review or a large overhaul. ECB chief economist Lane said to Bloomberg that 'the best type of review has a clear focus, knows its ambitions, and it's not so extensive that it becomes impossible to conclude.' We do see good arguments for a short and brief review, which could lead to a simple clarification of symmetry (e.g. deletion of ‘below') or going back to the pre-2003 mandate (e.g. deletion of ‘close to'), but we favour a large overhaul. This is due to the scope, as it may also include which variables to target. For example, the increased volatility in the energy component in the inflation basket has resulted in the ECB's reaction being dependent on core inflation, so targeting the core inflation (at a lower level than 2%) could be warranted.
Focus on Green – but not for the central bank in our view
Undoubtedly, policy makers have picked up comments on the sustainability debate in recent weeks and months, of which Lagarde is a proponent. While we generally side with the Bundesbank president on the green QE debate (green/sustainability is a structural change and QE should be used to address a cyclical problem), we welcome the debate if it reflects a change in the underlying economy. Naturally, the central bank should be wary of structural changes to the economy, but as such the EU has a large number of institutions whose mandate is closer to climate effort than the ECB (such as EIB and most recently the EC that wants to create a fund that can facilitate up to EUR100bn of green investments). In our view, the ECB has only one mandate. That said, with Lagarde as president, we cannot rule out a more prominent role for green in the ECB going forward.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.