Disruptions and Decisions: Nonlinear Policy Making
|Praise for tech disruptors is common and often given a positive spin to the view of change. However, in decision making at the public policy level, the view of disruptors is far less positive. Disruptors upset the status quo in any area they approach. This has been the history of disruption in the order of economic events. Railroads across America upset the established business of ferries crossing rivers. Autos upset the buggy whip industry. Ongoing disruption occurs today in the communications and entertainment sectors.
The afternoon knows what the morning never suspected.― Robert Frost
When economic and/or financial activity cannot be sustained, leadership enters the fray with a disruption in the order of events. Sometimes disturbing the old order came partly by circumstance as the old order could no longer be sustained. Upsetting the standards in financial markets and regulation were the immediate challenge to the methods of housing finance of the prior decade. While the financial regulation pendulum swings back and forth, sometimes the old order cannot be sustained and a new pendulum is put to work. Alternatively, policymakers, facing rising costs for medical care, acted to upset the existing modes of the health care industry. In neither financial nor health care fields are the outcomes from these disruptions likely to be permanent. Change is the only constant, so policymakers will alter the rules of the game ahead. The pendulum swings both ways and where the pendulum ends up is never certain. For example, financial/banking regulation in the U.S. has been ongoing since 1862 and even back to Andrew Jackson! Today we face disruption in financial, tax and trade policies. As expected, each faces opposition from the established domestic and foreign interests. So, the pendulum on financial, tax policy and trade policies are swinging back again. America has a history of pendulum swings in policy and is constantly searching for new solutions to new problems. For financial policy, the fundamental problem is how to allocate credit to provide for opportunity and growth without wasting capital on non-economic activities. Unfortunately, that balance has never been achieved in financial history and is unlikely to be achieved anytime soon. The housing bust was not the first and not the worst in U.S. history and not likely to be the last. Deregulation changes during the last year have moved the pendulum again. In perspective, it is not likely that we will “know” the correct balance—only time and experience will tell. In prior experience, the excesses of commercial paper, high yield bonds and home prices (Figure 1) were only known in hindsight. In the meantime, each of these innovations altered the established order.
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.