USD: Fed policy would be lower than it is under a price-level target mandate - ING
|That old-age cliché of the holiday season being a time for reflection couldn't be more apt to describe the past week in global markets as certainly, investors were afforded the opportunity to reflect on Fed policy after the central bank released the minutes to its November meeting, according to analysts at ING.
Key Quotes
“And while the default in recent years has been to view policy decisions of the world's most influential central bank over a three-month (or so) rolling window, it appears as though such short-termism is unlikely to be the optimal way to view Fed policy going into 2018. Indeed, when we read the latest minutes – and see the diverse range of views over crucial big picture issues facing the US economy – the risks of major shake-up in the Fed’s policy framework next year remain fairly high. While the White House could be the catalyst here – in that they still have the luxury of appointing 4 new FOMC members – we suspect changes may be more nuanced. For example, we may start to see a change in the way in which the Fed communicates its ‘symmetric inflation target’ – and this has been fairly evident in recent months, with some officials raising concerns that markets may be misinterpreting the Fed’s intent here.”
“Structurally low US inflation has been the prevailing theme in recent years and this has led the likes of former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke (and others) to float the idea of ‘temporary price-level targeting’. While we initially saw this as more of a thought exercise, our eyes did light up when we saw ‘price-level targeting’ being briefly discussed in the latest minutes – especially given our more bearish USD view. Out of curiosity, we simulated where the Fed funds rate would be had the central bank pursued a 2% price-level target since 2009; this chart shows that policy rates would be slightly lower than they currently are, simply owing to the fact that the Fed have failed to make up for ‘lost inflation’ since the financial crisis. While one may see any shift towards price-level targeting as radical, we do think such analysis helps to understand why the Fed have inherent dovish concerns – and why global markets can afford to remain bearish on US rates and the dollar.”
Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers.