FXstreet.com

US economic indicators

0

0

FOMC to keep fed funds rate stable

Mon, May 7 2007, 14:36 GMT
by BHF-Bank Economics Department

BHF-Bank


  • FOMC to keep fed funds rate stable; emphasis on possible moderation of inflation pressures
  • Trade balance will have deteriorated in March
  • Energy prices will again have had a marked impact on April inflation data
  • Retail sales ex gasoline will probably only have risen moderately in April

On Wednesday, the FOMC is very likely to leave the fed funds rate stable at 5.25%, where it has been since the end of June 2006. Monetary policy makers will probably state again that recent indicators have been mixed and that the weakness in the housing sector is by no means over yet. But all in all, the committee will probably stick to its forecast that the economy is likely to continue to expand at a moderate pace over coming quarters. As the core PCE deflator remained unchanged in March and its annual rate declined to 2.1%, the committee might omit the phrase that recent readings on core inflation have been somewhat elevated. They could perhaps merely state that, despite some risks from high utilization rates, inflation pressures are likely to moderate over time, particularly since growth in unit labour costs slowed considerably in Q1 (0.6% qoq and 1.3% yoy after 6.2% qoq and 3.4% yoy).

The February trade deficit narrowed slightly by 0.44bn to 58.44bn, as both exports and imports had fallen markedly. According to the GDP figures for Q1, exports may have gone up moderately in March, while imports could have risen sharply, which is also indicated by the increase in import prices of 1.7% mom. Higher energy prices may have played a major role in widening the deficit, whereas – according to Chinese figures – the trade deficit with China seems to have narrowed. We expect the March trade deficit to have risen to about $61.0bn. However, this would still be significantly lower than the record deficit of $68.9bn registered in August 2006.

Import prices had already increased sharply by 1.7% mom in March, but due to the ongoing increase in oil prices, we expect them to have risen by a further 1.2% mom in April. However, due to a base effect, the annual rate could neverthless decline from 2.8% to below 2%. Import prices ex petroleum, which rose by 0.3% mom in March, could have increased by a similar rate, partly because of higher natural gas prices.

While overall producer prices (PPI) went up sharply by 1.0% mom in March, core PPI remained unchanged. Energy prices will have continued to have a noticeable impact on PPI in April, but food prices might have developed more moderately after three consecutive sharp increases of about 1.5% mom on average. Bearing in mind the recent updrift in import prices and the significantly higher ISM prices component, we expect overall PPI to have risen by 0.6% mom and core PPI to have gone up by a more trend-like 0.2% mom in April. The annual rates may not differ much from their levels in the previous month.

Initial jobless claims fell again quite strongly in the week ending 28 April, by 21k to only 305k. However, this may still be connected with the weather conditions, as cold temperatures and snow storms boosted jobless claims at the beginning of April. The 4-week moving average only fluctuated between 323k and 333k in April, which seems to describe labour market conditions more accurately. However, as the seasonal adjustment might foresee a sharp rise in claims connected with a government shutdown in Puerto Rico in the previous year, jobless claims could either have remained at the low level of 305k in the week ending 5 May, or even have fallen slightly.

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), April’s budget is likely to show a surplus of $176bn, $57bn more than the surplus recorded in the same month last year. Outlays seem to have been moderately higher, but revenues will have increased by a whopping 30%. However, calendar effects explains two thirds of that improvement. All in all, the budget deficit in the first seven months of the current fiscal year would reach a mere $83bn – $101bn less than in the same period last year.

Retail sales rose by 0.7% mom in March, which was more than expected. However, as consumer confidence declined considerably at the beginning of spring, we forecast that growth in retail sales will have slowed to 0.4% mom in April, despite a slight improvement in vehicle sales. Moreover, at least half of that increase may once again be due to sales at gasoline stations, as gasoline prices went up again, by almost 10% mom.

According to the Bureau of Economic Analysis, the change in business inventories subtracted 0.3 percentage points from real GDP in Q1. We thus expect March figures to be relatively subdued. We already know that factory inventories only increased by 0.2% mom, and wholesale inventories are expected to have risen by 0.4% mom. Given that retail inventories probably declined, we expect overall business inventories to have risen by 0.2% mom at best in March.


Archive

BHF-BANK Aktiengesellschaft  | Bockenheimer Landstrasse 10 60323 Frankfurt am Main
http://www.bhf-bank.com/w3/index.en.jsp | corp-comm@bhf-bank.com

Legal disclaimer and risk disclosure

This report has been prepared by BHF-BANK Aktiengesellschaft on behalf of itself and its affiliated companies (together "BHFBANK Group") solely for the information of its clients. The information and opinions in this document are based on sources believed to be reliable and acting in good faith, but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made by any member of the BHF-BANK Group as to their accuracy, completeness or correctness. Opinions and recommendations are given in good faith but without legal responsibility and are subject to change without notice. The information does not constitute advice or personal recommendation, for which the duty of suitability would be owed, but may facilitate your own investment decision. Moreover, you should seek your own advice as to the suitability of an investment matter mentioned herein. Investors are reminded that the price of securities and the income from them can go down as well as up and that the past performance of an investment or a market is not necessarily indicative for future results. This document is for information purposes only. Descriptions of any company or companies or their securities mentioned herein are not intended to be complete, and this document is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy the securities mentioned in it. BHF-BANK Group and its officers and employees may have a long or short position or engage in transactions in any of the securities mentioned in this document, or in any related securities. This publication must not be distributed in the United States. © 2009 BHF-BANK Aktiengesellschaft All rights reserved. Please mention source when quoting from it.


Interested in forex trading? forex brokerage firms!


Forex Capital Markets, LLC (FXCM)
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
ACM Advanced Currency Markets SA
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
CitiFX Pro
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
MF Global FXA Securities Ltd.
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
Saxo Bank A/S
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account

GET CASH BACK FOR YOUR TRADES!   Learn more about the Pip Rebate Program

Note: All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer.

Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you. Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Opinions expressed at FXstreet.com are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of FXstreet.com or its management. FXstreet.com has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: errors and Omissions may occur.

Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website, by FXstreet.com, its employees, partners or contributors, is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. FXstreet.com will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

©2009 "FXstreet.com. The Forex Market" All Rights Reserved.