This report has been deactivated

10

0
This Recession Is Far From Over
Thu, Jun 18 2009, 10:17 GMT
by Claus Vogt
Money and Markets
The crisis is over, or nearly so, say Wall Street and the huge majority of bulls. All those economists, central bankers and analysts, who didn't see this crisis coming and who underestimated its severity all the way down, are sure that the worst is over now.
Should you believe them?
All these "green shoots" as of late may turn out to be harbingers of a trend change for the better in the economy. That's indeed a possibility. Or they may just be a passing flare as were similar developments during the 1930s. This latter scenario is much more probable. Let's look at why ...
The U.S. Labor Market Is Still Very Weak
Nonfarm payrolls for May fell by 345,000. This was considerably better than the expected loss of 520,000. And it was much better than in April (-504,000), March (-652,000), February (-681,000), and January (-741,000). The bulls took this latest figure as a sure sign of an impending end of the recession.
Not so fast ...
First, 345,000 lost jobs are nothing to brag about. Just because there were more job losses in the months before doesn't turn it into good news. History agrees: Looking back at the worst point of the 2001 recession, payrolls shrank by 325,000. And this was right after 9/11. In the 1990/91 recession the worst payroll figure came in with a loss of 306,000. So the latest number sure as heck isn't worth cheering over.
Second, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) uses a model to estimate what may be going on in those parts of the labor market where the statisticians do not get data. This Birth/Death Adjustment Model pertains to small and new corporations in 10 non-farm supersectors, including leisure and hospitality.
This model said 220,000 new jobs were added in May.
In fact, the BLS even assumed that 7,000 financial service jobs and 43,000 construction jobs were created. This is highly unlikely because in the other part of the BLS report, where real data are available, both sectors showed job losses of 89,000. This discrepancy does not make any sense whatsoever!
And interestingly, this dubious plug factor has grown by 27 percent year-over-year.
The problem is that the Birth/Death figure cannot be verified since it was modeled. If we assume it's bogus, 565,000 jobs were actually lost in May!
Third, there is another important statistic pertaining to the condition of the labor market: Aggregate-hours worked. This index fell 0.7 percent in May after a 0.3 percent drop in April. So there's definitely no "green shoot" there.
Fourth, the unemployment rate rose to 9.4 percent in May, up from 8.9 percent in April. In a garden variety recession the unemployment rate is a lagging indicator. But not so in a post-bubble economy where debt problems are the major drivers of the down turn. Furthermore, unemployment has a big influence on mortgage and consumer delinquency rates.
Where Will A Recovery Come From?
Again, this is not a garden variety recession. The current problems stemming from a burst real estate bubble, over indebtedness and huge wealth destruction are much bigger than typical concomitants of recessions. The longevity of typical post-bubble problems argues strongly against a quick recovery.
To end recessions and lead the way to recovery there have been three typical developments:
- Pent up demand for housing led to a strong revival of the real estate market and invigorated construction. Don't expect this to happen right after the country's largest real estate bubble burst.
- Pent up demand for automobiles played another important role in digging the economy out of a recession. This time around, though, the U.S. auto industry is in shatters.
- After short recessionary dips, consumption reemerged strongly by means of surging consumer credit balances. Now the saving rate is surging, and demographics argue strongly that this is just the beginning of a long-term trend.
Yes, the economy isn't contracting as much as it was a few months ago. But the probability of this "less bad" economy evolving into a recovery is very low.
The stock market has already fully embraced the strong recovery scenario. However, "less bad" has to turn into something "really good" soon. Otherwise a huge disappointment will suck the stock market down the drain.
Published on
Thu, Jun 18 2009, 10:20 GMT
Weiss Research, Inc
| 15430 Endeavour Drive. Jupiter, FL 33478-6400 - USA
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com | eletter@moneyandmarkets.com
Legal disclaimer and risk disclosure
Money and Markets e-newsletter is published by Weiss Research, Inc. Weiss Research, Inc. is strictly a research publishing firm and does not provide individual investment advice to its subscribers. The information we publish is based on our opinions plus our statistical and financial data and independent research. Although we make every effort to provide the most accurate and updated information possible, our information cannot take into consideration your personal finances and goals, and therefore is not intended to be used as customized recommendation to buy, hold, or sell securities, or engage in any trading strategy. Such recommendations may only be made by a personal advisor or the broker you select.
Most investments involve risk of loss. Although this service makes every effort to protect your principal, you can lose money. Therefore, it is not for all of your funds. If your goal for a certain portion of your funds is strictly capital preservation, we believe you should invest those funds in conservative investments such as short-term U.S. Treasury securities or equivalent. For more information on prudent investing, see also the information available at the websites of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority at www.finra.org.
Most of the information we publish is derived from primary sources, including the U.S. government agencies as well as the financial institutions or publicly traded companies we cover. We believe our data sources are accurate, but we do not verify their accuracy independently. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the information is accurate or complete. Nor do we guarantee the success of any investment decision you may make using our data, information, or recommendations.
To help us track the performance of this service, subscribers are asked to give their brokers’ permission to share statements with us strictly for the purpose of substantiating the results of the trading. If broker documents are available on a particular trade, we use them to calculate the net, after-commission profits on the trade. Naturally, the results of each subscriber may differ depending on the actual prices achieved and the commissions paid. If broker documents are not available on a trade, we estimate the pre-commission gains based on the market prices following the publication of each recommendation. In addition, examples of potential performance returns may sometimes be based on simulated — not actual — trades, assuming entry and exit prices that could have been obtained during regular market conditions. These entry and exit prices calculated do not reflect or include costs of spreads, market delays, or fees and commissions. Similar returns may or may not be actually achieved by subscribers.
While every effort is made to evaluate the actual experience of subscribers, most performance figures must be considered hypothetical, and past results are no guarantee of future performance. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
References to examples of past performance are not intended to provide a total picture of portfolio results. Your results may vary considerably depending on a series of factors, including: (a) when you begin or cease investing, (b) which recommendations you choose to act on, (c) how much money you choose to invest in each recommendation, (d) the specific prices you get, (e) the broker commissions you pay, (f) the interest income you earn on uninvested funds, and (g) the number and magnitude of losing or winning trades you experience.
With the exception of exempt securities such as government securities and mutual funds, all Weiss Group, Inc. and Weiss Research, Inc. personnel are prohibited from purchasing any security or investment that is recommended in its publications, per the company’s Personal Securities Transaction (PST) policy.
LIMITATION ON WEISS RESEARCH’S LIABILITY
Weiss Research’s liability, whether in contract, tort, negligence, or otherwise, shall be limited in the aggregate to direct and actual damages not to exceed the fees received by Weiss from Subscriber. Weiss will not be liable for consequential, incidental, punitive, special, exemplary, or indirect damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon any material provided by Weiss. Without limitation, Weiss shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damages related to, either directly or indirectly, (1) any decline in market value or loss of any investment; (2) a subscriber’s inability to use or any delay in accessing the Weiss website or any other source of material provided by Weiss; (3) any absence of material on the Weiss website; (4) Weiss’ failure to deliver or delay in delivering any material or (5) any kind of error in transmission of material; or (6) the use by a subscriber of any research to invest in any way which may be deemed unsuitable in accordance with certain industry standards. Weiss and Subscriber acknowledge that, without limitation, the above-enumerated conditions cannot be the probable cause of any breach of any agreement between Weiss and Subscriber. "No-risk" and "risk-free" refer solely to the subscription price refund policy.
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY
ANY AND ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED BY WEISS IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WEISS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Related reports
Top Fundamental Stories - The world's largest economy remains fragile… by ecPulse.com
Mon, Nov 23 2009, 13:46 GMT
Weekly Calendar - Week of 11/23/2009 thru 11/27/2009 by TradeTheNews.com
Mon, Nov 23 2009, 07:03 GMT
The Trading Week - The Trading Week: Nov. 23 - Nov. 27 by AllThingsForex
Sat, Nov 21 2009, 16:33 GMT
Macro Monitor - Czech Republic by Danske Bank A/S
Fri, Nov 20 2009, 13:17 GMT
Daily US Opening News by RANsquawk
Fri, Nov 20 2009, 12:01 GMT
crisis, fundnew
View All
Related content
2nd UPDATE: BOE:Balance Sheet May Not Regain Pre-Crisis Level
Dow Jones | Thu, Nov 19 2009, 14:37 GMT
UPDATE:Fisher:BOE Balance Sheet May Not Hit Pre-Crisis Level
Dow Jones | Thu, Nov 19 2009, 10:23 GMT
UPDATE: Germany Merkel: To Hold Summit On Crisis Dec 2
Dow Jones | Wed, Nov 18 2009, 14:24 GMT
Germany's Merkel: Government To Hold Summit On Crisis Dec 2
Dow Jones | Wed, Nov 18 2009, 13:03 GMT
UK Econ May Suffer As Govt Cost-Saving Initiatives End -Survey
Dow Jones | Tue, Nov 17 2009, 00:05 GMT
crisis, fundnew
View All
The Advisor Weblog » Will optimism give way to realism?
Tue, Nov 10 2009, 15:55 GMT
ForexHedge » USA Bank failure # 95
Mon, Sep 28 2009, 06:58 GMT
ForexHedge » The Billion Dollar Gram
Mon, Aug 17 2009, 10:57 GMT
ForexHedge » Some US economic realistic facts
Fri, Aug 14 2009, 03:35 GMT
Trade Setups » Fun and Games expected later this week
Tue, Jun 30 2009, 07:29 GMT
crisis, fundnew
View All