“You cannot step twice into the same river…”
Heraclitus, as quoted by Plato in Cratylus
In the Blue Chip Survey published just after the first Obama administration stimulus passed, the consensus estimate for the unemployment rate in the fourth quarter of this year was 9.2 percent.1 Moreover, the top 10 most pessimistic forecasts had unemployment hitting nine percent as soon as the second quarter. Congratulations to them. Our March forecast had unemployment hitting 9.6 percent during the second half of this year.2 Therefore, when Vice President Biden says, “The truth is, we and everyone else misread the economy,” we know that he is taking political liberties with the economic facts.3 Everyone did not misread the economy. Contrary to political rhetoric, economic analysis outside the beltway clearly anticipated a nine percent plus unemployment rate even with the stimulus package.
As we begin the third quarter of this year, there have been renewed proposals for another stimulus, Part Deux, to get this economy going. For decision-makers outside the political beltway, there are several principles that underlie the risks to such a strategy and the outlook for growth, inflation, interest rates and the dollar. Each of these core economic drivers of institutional success will be affected by any attempt at stimulus Part Deux.
Recovery in Growth: Patience not Politics
First, the initial Obama administration stimulus needs time to work. Politicians are quick to overpromise and this was certainly again true in this case. The American voter was eager for solutions, but the economy is not instant oatmeal. In a society accustomed to microwaved leftovers, the economy is a slow cooker. Washington was simply too optimistic on how fast the economy would react to policy action.
Setting the political promises aside, estimates by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) suggested that most of the impact of the stimulus would begin to appear in the third (now the current) quarter, and then continue into the fourth quarter and the first quarter of next year.4 The major thrust of the stimulus would be felt in the 2010 fiscal year which begins this coming October, according to the CBO (Table 1). Here at Wells Fargo, our assessment was the same, as our March forecast called for a significant rise in federal spending beginning in the third quarter, leading to overall positive growth for the entire economy by the fourth quarter. To credit the CBO again, it indicated that only one-third of government checks would be sent out by the end of September and just 11 percent of infrastructure spending would be started. Shovel ready was nothing of the sort.
During the current quarter, business decision-makers can start to anticipate positive overall economic growth. Unfortunately, a second stimulus could add too much to the growth momentum to be consistent with stability in long-run inflation, interest rates and currency expectations. Inflation/debt concerns, which are already rising, would accelerate quickly and thereby prompt negative interest rate/dollar reactions that would create a boom/bust cycle—especially in the sensitive credit markets. Such a boom/bust cycle would hamper efforts to improve the long-run growth fundamentals in the overall economy that are so necessary to meet entitlement commitments. A second stimulus would, in our opinion, run the risk of steroid-induced, short-run growth increases at the cost of significant long-run losses in economic muscle.







