FXstreet.com

This report has been deactivated

0

0

I Have Seen the Enemy, and He is CDS

Fri, Sep 19 2008, 14:21 GMT
by Mike Larson

Money and Markets


It's been quite the eventful week on the bailout front, eh?

The Treasury and Federal Reserve drew the line at Lehman Brothers, allowing the fourth-largest broker in the U.S. to file for bankruptcy.

Then a couple days later, the Fed backtracked and arranged an $85 billion bailout of American International Group. The deal gives AIG a two-year loan at a punitive interest rate of 11.5%, and grants the Fed a 79.9% stake in the insurance firm. The idea is to keep AIG afloat while it sells assets to raise money.

Personally, this is just more evidence that no one seems to know how deep this rabbit hole of losses goes. Every time one troubled financial institution gets saved or fails, another troubled one pops up somewhere else.

As I've been discussing for a long time, crummy residential mortgages ... troubled commercial mortgages ... and all kinds of other souring loans are causing a huge chunk of the problems in the banking and brokerage industry. But in the case of AIG, something else is at work. It's an obscure kind of contract that, behind the scenes, is wreaking havoc throughout the financial industry.

And I want to talk about these "CDS" — or Credit Default Swaps — today.


How Credit Insurance Works

I'm sure you know how traditional insurance works. After all, you have some combination of homeowners insurance, life insurance, auto insurance, and maybe even a policy on an RV, a boat, or a motorcycle.

You pay a monthly, semi-annual, or annual premium to an insurance company. And the company invests that money to generate returns. If a catastrophe strikes — you get in a car crash, your house burns down, or you die — the insurance company pays you or your heirs a lump sum of money.

It's a pretty straightforward business.

But in the past few years, many Wall Street firms, hedge funds, and companies like AIG plunged headlong into the Wild West World of CDS.

CDS operate like insurance on a bond or other security. Let's say you're a portfolio manager who owns $100 million in XYZ Corp. bonds. You read the paper, and you see that the industry XYZ is in is faltering, with sales declining and profits falling.

As a result, you might be concerned about the possibility that XYZ will default on the bonds you're holding. But for one reason or another, you don't want to sell your bonds and move on. So instead, you go into the market and buy CDS to protect you against the possibility of default.

You — the credit protection buyer — would pay periodic premiums (just like you and I do on life or car insurance) to a credit protection seller. If XYZ does NOT default, then the seller just collects his premiums and makes a decent return. If XYZ does default, then the seller either takes the bonds off your hands, paying you face value (regardless of where they're trading), or he pays you a cash settlement that makes you whole.

Either way, you as the buyer are protected from catastrophic loss — just like a homeowner is protected from catastrophe by his policy when his home burns down.


The Flaws in the System

Sounds good, right? But here are the problems ...

First, CDS aren't highly regulated like the traditional insurance market is at the state level. In fact, the CDS market isn't really regulated at all. As we alerted our Safe Money Report readers way back in a November 2006 gala issue on derivatives ...

"Complacency is now unprecedented and regulators are asleep at the switch. The Securities and Exchange Commission says it has no direct supervision of trading in credit derivatives. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission also says it isn't responsible. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) says the industry can policy itself. We're not so sure."

Second, the CDS market exploded in size over the past several years. According to the British Bankers Association, the CDS market expanded from just $180 billion in 1996 to a stunning $20 trillion a decade later. That's a 111-fold expansion in this esoteric, opaque market. And by all accounts, it continued to grow LAST year as well — to a whopping $57.9 TRILLION, according to the Bank for International Settlements.

Third, the CDS market morphed into a vehicle for massive speculation on corporate credit rather than a way to hedge downside risk. Investors started buying CDS on companies with worsening credit — expecting those contracts to rise in value — and selling CDS on companies with improving credit — expecting to record a gain as those contracts declined in value.

Fourth, the quality of counterparties in the CDS market deteriorated substantially. What do I mean? When you bought your last homeowners or life insurance policy, you probably checked the credit rating of the company selling that policy. After all, what good is insurance if the company standing behind it can't make good on claims?

The problem is that more and more CDS were being bought and sold by hedge funds and other thinly capitalized companies during the boom days. This excerpt from a recent Minyanville column pretty much sums up the problem:

"A hedge fund trader once told me that they insured/sold 50 times their capital in CDS with the counterparty being a very large, well-known investment bank.

"When I asked him if he was worried about that kind of leverage, he responded by saying that is the bank's problem because if he is wrong about writing all these insurance policies (in the form of CDS), they can only lose their investment capital in the fund."

Comforting, eh?


The Fallout is Spreading

So how does AIG fit into all this?

Well, it sold protection on a mind-boggling $441 billion of fixed income securities. $441 billion! According to Bloomberg, almost $58 billion of those contracts referenced securities tied to subprime mortgages. That's what really brought AIG to its knees — the exposure to the CDS market.

Who else has massive exposure to credit derivatives?

According to a Fitch Ratings report from last year, the top five counterparties on CDS contracts (as of 2006) were:

  • * Morgan Stanley,
  • * Goldman Sachs,
  • * JPMorgan Chase,
  • * Deutsche Bank, and
  • * ABN Amro.

It's impossible to know exactly how these institutions are positioned, how those rankings have changed since then, and so on. What we do know is that this garbage paper is spread throughout the system, that the underlying securities that CDS insure are plunging in value, and that the financial tally from this whole mess is rising month in and month out.

If you needed yet ANOTHER reason to remain skeptical of the financial industry's fortunes, the CDS market is it. Stay safe!

This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.

Weiss Research, Inc  | 15430 Endeavour Drive. Jupiter, FL 33478-6400 - USA
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com | eletter@moneyandmarkets.com

Legal disclaimer and risk disclosure

Money and Markets e-newsletter is published by Weiss Research, Inc. Weiss Research, Inc. is strictly a research publishing firm and does not provide individual investment advice to its subscribers. The information we publish is based on our opinions plus our statistical and financial data and independent research. Although we make every effort to provide the most accurate and updated information possible, our information cannot take into consideration your personal finances and goals, and therefore is not intended to be used as customized recommendation to buy, hold, or sell securities, or engage in any trading strategy. Such recommendations may only be made by a personal advisor or the broker you select. Most investments involve risk of loss. Although this service makes every effort to protect your principal, you can lose money. Therefore, it is not for all of your funds. If your goal for a certain portion of your funds is strictly capital preservation, we believe you should invest those funds in conservative investments such as short-term U.S. Treasury securities or equivalent. For more information on prudent investing, see also the information available at the websites of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority at www.finra.org. Most of the information we publish is derived from primary sources, including the U.S. government agencies as well as the financial institutions or publicly traded companies we cover. We believe our data sources are accurate, but we do not verify their accuracy independently. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the information is accurate or complete. Nor do we guarantee the success of any investment decision you may make using our data, information, or recommendations. To help us track the performance of this service, subscribers are asked to give their brokers’ permission to share statements with us strictly for the purpose of substantiating the results of the trading. If broker documents are available on a particular trade, we use them to calculate the net, after-commission profits on the trade. Naturally, the results of each subscriber may differ depending on the actual prices achieved and the commissions paid. If broker documents are not available on a trade, we estimate the pre-commission gains based on the market prices following the publication of each recommendation. In addition, examples of potential performance returns may sometimes be based on simulated — not actual — trades, assuming entry and exit prices that could have been obtained during regular market conditions. These entry and exit prices calculated do not reflect or include costs of spreads, market delays, or fees and commissions. Similar returns may or may not be actually achieved by subscribers. While every effort is made to evaluate the actual experience of subscribers, most performance figures must be considered hypothetical, and past results are no guarantee of future performance. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. References to examples of past performance are not intended to provide a total picture of portfolio results. Your results may vary considerably depending on a series of factors, including: (a) when you begin or cease investing, (b) which recommendations you choose to act on, (c) how much money you choose to invest in each recommendation, (d) the specific prices you get, (e) the broker commissions you pay, (f) the interest income you earn on uninvested funds, and (g) the number and magnitude of losing or winning trades you experience. With the exception of exempt securities such as government securities and mutual funds, all Weiss Group, Inc. and Weiss Research, Inc. personnel are prohibited from purchasing any security or investment that is recommended in its publications, per the company’s Personal Securities Transaction (PST) policy. LIMITATION ON WEISS RESEARCH’S LIABILITY Weiss Research’s liability, whether in contract, tort, negligence, or otherwise, shall be limited in the aggregate to direct and actual damages not to exceed the fees received by Weiss from Subscriber. Weiss will not be liable for consequential, incidental, punitive, special, exemplary, or indirect damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon any material provided by Weiss. Without limitation, Weiss shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damages related to, either directly or indirectly, (1) any decline in market value or loss of any investment; (2) a subscriber’s inability to use or any delay in accessing the Weiss website or any other source of material provided by Weiss; (3) any absence of material on the Weiss website; (4) Weiss’ failure to deliver or delay in delivering any material or (5) any kind of error in transmission of material; or (6) the use by a subscriber of any research to invest in any way which may be deemed unsuitable in accordance with certain industry standards. Weiss and Subscriber acknowledge that, without limitation, the above-enumerated conditions cannot be the probable cause of any breach of any agreement between Weiss and Subscriber. "No-risk" and "risk-free" refer solely to the subscription price refund policy. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY ANY AND ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED BY WEISS IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WEISS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


Interested in forex trading? forex brokerage firms!


ACM Advanced Currency Markets SA
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
MG Financial Group
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
Forex Capital Markets, LLC (FXCM)
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
MIG INVESTMENTS SA
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
Deutsche Bank
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account

GET CASH BACK FOR YOUR TRADES!   Learn more about the Pip Rebate Program

Note: All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer.

Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you. Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Opinions expressed at FXstreet.com are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of FXstreet.com or its management. FXstreet.com has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: errors and Omissions may occur.

Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website, by FXstreet.com, its employees, partners or contributors, is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. FXstreet.com will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

©2009 "FXstreet.com. The Forex Market" All Rights Reserved.