This report has been deactivated

5

0
Geithner Goes Begging in China What
Fri, Jun 5 2009, 13:22 GMT
by Mike Larson
Money and Markets
So this is what it's come to: Our Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, has to jet off to Beijing to beg for mercy from our biggest global creditor.
He has to sit by and be lectured in the ways of finance by Chinese officials.
He has to endure the laughter of Chinese students at Peking University, who openly scoffed at his reassurances that "Chinese financial assets are very safe."
And he has to abandon plans to pressure China on its currency. The Obama administration had previously been arguing that the yuan was undervalued, artificially subsidizing Chinese manufacturers at the expense of U.S.-based firms.
The bottom line? The balance of world financial power is shifting and not in a good way for America. Worse, I see no evidence that we're doing anything about it! Instead, we get a bunch of happy talk and spin, with little or no action.
Washington Happy Talk vs. Reality on the Ground in China
Before, during, and after Geithner's China trip, the Washington spin machine was shifting into overdrive. I've already seen a few reports calling Geithner's trip a success. Geithner himself has been making statements like the following:
"I've actually found a lot of confidence here in China, justifiable confidence, in the strength and resilience and dynamism of the American economy and I think a very sophisticated understanding ... of the steps we're taking and why they're so important not just to the United States but to China and the rest of the world."
Excuse me, but does anyone believe that for a second? I sure as heck don't. And neither do the Chinese. The reality on the ground in China is much more skeptical and severe.
For example, Bloomberg recounted a conversation in which Geithner was lectured about U.S. profligacy:
Yu Yongding, a former central bank adviser who acted as the interviewer for The China Daily newspaper, told Geithner: "I worry about details. We will be watching you very carefully."
A report from The Washington Post was even more blunt, warning that "Geithner's remarks stand in sharp contrast to the commentary in China's official propaganda papers."
According to the Post ...
- The China Daily said it will be "regrettable if [Geithner] underestimates and shuts his ears to voices from China's civil society," noting that there are worries that "Washington's mushrooming deficit, generated by massive government borrowing to fuel its economic recovery plan ... will undermine both the dollar and U.S. bonds."
- The Global Times, which is affiliated with the Communist Party, said an online poll found that 87 percent of respondents believe China's dollar-assets are unsafe. The paper concluded, "Ordinary Chinese people are discontent with the declining value of China's huge foreign exchange reserves denominated in U.S. dollars."
- And The Economic Information Daily, which is part of the official New China News Agency and affiliated with the State Council, in a headline demanded to know of Geithner: "How do you propose implementing fiscal discipline? How will you maintain the stability of the dollar after the crisis?"
Why Aren't the Chinese Buying The Washington Party Line?
Well, the Obama administration and members of Congress on both sides of the aisle have been paying a lot of lip service to getting the deficit under control. We're getting plenty of talk, talk, talk. But policymakers are taking steps that have the exact opposite effect! They're spending like crazy and borrowing like mad!
The administration itself was just forced to raise its 2009 budget deficit estimate to a staggering $1.84 trillion, up 5 percent from a projection made just two months earlier. The 2010 estimate was jacked up by more than 7 percent to $1.26 trillion.
Geithner told the Chinese that we plan to eventually shrink the deficit to 3 percent of GDP. But that's a pipe dream. Right now, we're on track to hit 12.9 percent — by far the worst since the founding of the Republic (excluding an anomalous period during World War II when the war effort was the dominant force in the entire economy).
Getting that under control will require a massive boost in economic growth or a large increase in taxes. To anyone who believes those scenarios are in the cards, all I can say is: I've got a bridge to sell you!
Or as Pimco Chief Investment Officer Bill Gross put it in his latest monthly outlook:
"While policymakers, including the President and Treasury Secretary Geithner, assure voters and financial markets alike that such a path is unsustainable and that a return to fiscal conservatism is just around the recovery's corner, it is hard to comprehend exactly how that more balanced rabbit can be pulled out of Washington's hat."
The Market is Extracting Its Pound of Flesh — Make Sure You Protect Yourself ...
The approach from Geithner, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke, and others in the political establishment continues to be akin to Alfred E. Neuman's. You know, the Mad Magazine character whose signature line is "What, me worry?"
They keep telling us to relax. They say the Chinese, the Russians, and everyone else have no alternative to the dollar. They figure they can continue getting away with shafting our creditors, with no consequences.
I've argued the opposite — and the market action shows I'm right. Just look at what REAL MONEY investors are doing. They're dumping bonds. They're dumping the dollar. They're buying gold, oil, and other hard assets.
The broad-based dollar index is down roughly 12 percent in just the past three months. Crude oil has soared as much as 113 percent from its December low. Gold is closing in on $1,000 an ounce, while silver has almost doubled.
Meanwhile, The New York Times recently reported that the Chinese are hiding in short-term Treasury bills because they don't want the risk that comes with long-term bonds. A key advisor to the Qatari ruling elite advised that country to diversify away from dollars. Then this week, Russian president Dmitry Medvedev proposed forming a new multi-national currency that would supplant the dollar as a central bank reserve asset.
Is any of this going to happen overnight? Is the dollar going to go to zero next week? Are 10-year Treasury Note yields going to hit double-digits next month? No on all counts. In fact, we could see a short-term bounce in the dollar and bonds here.
But the LONG-TERM trends should be abundantly clear by now. The forces I warned you about months ago are coming to a head, and the ramifications are clear for investors like you. You simply have to take steps to protect yourself from these out-of-control bureaucrats in D.C. and adjust to the new financial reality — that the balance of global financial power is shifting.
Published on
Fri, Jun 5 2009, 13:26 GMT
Weiss Research, Inc
| 15430 Endeavour Drive. Jupiter, FL 33478-6400 - USA
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com | eletter@moneyandmarkets.com
Legal disclaimer and risk disclosure
Money and Markets e-newsletter is published by Weiss Research, Inc. Weiss Research, Inc. is strictly a research publishing firm and does not provide individual investment advice to its subscribers. The information we publish is based on our opinions plus our statistical and financial data and independent research. Although we make every effort to provide the most accurate and updated information possible, our information cannot take into consideration your personal finances and goals, and therefore is not intended to be used as customized recommendation to buy, hold, or sell securities, or engage in any trading strategy. Such recommendations may only be made by a personal advisor or the broker you select.
Most investments involve risk of loss. Although this service makes every effort to protect your principal, you can lose money. Therefore, it is not for all of your funds. If your goal for a certain portion of your funds is strictly capital preservation, we believe you should invest those funds in conservative investments such as short-term U.S. Treasury securities or equivalent. For more information on prudent investing, see also the information available at the websites of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority at www.finra.org.
Most of the information we publish is derived from primary sources, including the U.S. government agencies as well as the financial institutions or publicly traded companies we cover. We believe our data sources are accurate, but we do not verify their accuracy independently. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the information is accurate or complete. Nor do we guarantee the success of any investment decision you may make using our data, information, or recommendations.
To help us track the performance of this service, subscribers are asked to give their brokers’ permission to share statements with us strictly for the purpose of substantiating the results of the trading. If broker documents are available on a particular trade, we use them to calculate the net, after-commission profits on the trade. Naturally, the results of each subscriber may differ depending on the actual prices achieved and the commissions paid. If broker documents are not available on a trade, we estimate the pre-commission gains based on the market prices following the publication of each recommendation. In addition, examples of potential performance returns may sometimes be based on simulated — not actual — trades, assuming entry and exit prices that could have been obtained during regular market conditions. These entry and exit prices calculated do not reflect or include costs of spreads, market delays, or fees and commissions. Similar returns may or may not be actually achieved by subscribers.
While every effort is made to evaluate the actual experience of subscribers, most performance figures must be considered hypothetical, and past results are no guarantee of future performance. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
References to examples of past performance are not intended to provide a total picture of portfolio results. Your results may vary considerably depending on a series of factors, including: (a) when you begin or cease investing, (b) which recommendations you choose to act on, (c) how much money you choose to invest in each recommendation, (d) the specific prices you get, (e) the broker commissions you pay, (f) the interest income you earn on uninvested funds, and (g) the number and magnitude of losing or winning trades you experience.
With the exception of exempt securities such as government securities and mutual funds, all Weiss Group, Inc. and Weiss Research, Inc. personnel are prohibited from purchasing any security or investment that is recommended in its publications, per the company’s Personal Securities Transaction (PST) policy.
LIMITATION ON WEISS RESEARCH’S LIABILITY
Weiss Research’s liability, whether in contract, tort, negligence, or otherwise, shall be limited in the aggregate to direct and actual damages not to exceed the fees received by Weiss from Subscriber. Weiss will not be liable for consequential, incidental, punitive, special, exemplary, or indirect damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon any material provided by Weiss. Without limitation, Weiss shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damages related to, either directly or indirectly, (1) any decline in market value or loss of any investment; (2) a subscriber’s inability to use or any delay in accessing the Weiss website or any other source of material provided by Weiss; (3) any absence of material on the Weiss website; (4) Weiss’ failure to deliver or delay in delivering any material or (5) any kind of error in transmission of material; or (6) the use by a subscriber of any research to invest in any way which may be deemed unsuitable in accordance with certain industry standards. Weiss and Subscriber acknowledge that, without limitation, the above-enumerated conditions cannot be the probable cause of any breach of any agreement between Weiss and Subscriber. "No-risk" and "risk-free" refer solely to the subscription price refund policy.
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY
ANY AND ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED BY WEISS IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WEISS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Related reports
Forex Analysis on Majors - Expecting Bullish Break in Euro by Forex Ltd
Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:59 GMT
Currency on the Day - EURUSD Technical Analysis by Investija.com
Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:45 GMT
Forex Trading Strategies - Dollar bears take a breather as Asia focuses on bank capital levels by Saxo Bank
Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:27 GMT
Forex Chartist Technical Analysis - GBP/USD & EUR/USD by Charmer Charts.com
Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:15 GMT
Daily Forex and Dow Jones Recommended Levels by FXtechtrade
Tue, Nov 24 2009, 06:09 GMT
geithner, eurusd, china, gbpusd
View All
Related content
Forex: GBP/USD: Fall to 1.6294/50 zone should feature short-term - Commerzbank
FXstreet.com | Tue, Nov 24 2009, 08:10 GMT
UPDATE: German Economic Recovery Broadened In 3Q
Dow Jones | Tue, Nov 24 2009, 08:00 GMT
Forex: GBP/USD: Pullback from 1.6650 extends below 1.6550
FXstreet.com | Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:35 GMT
Forex: EUR/USD: Euro accelerates downtrend, testing 1.4900
FXstreet.com | Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:18 GMT
Asian markets decline on concerns about Japan; Euro and Pound trim gains
FXstreet.com | Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:07 GMT
geithner, eurusd, china, gbpusd
View All
FX Market Readings » Volatile move Vs false move
Tue, Nov 24 2009, 07:52 GMT
FX Market Readings » Early US session
Tue, Nov 24 2009, 00:42 GMT
ForexHedge » Airbus Euro’s or Boeing Dollars ?
Mon, Nov 23 2009, 15:45 GMT
Chartology » Two Looks at the Short Term 15min EUR/USD
Mon, Nov 23 2009, 15:41 GMT
Tech Trading » EUR/USD Towards 1,5060
Mon, Nov 23 2009, 12:08 GMT
geithner, eurusd, china, gbpusd
View All
Gbpusd - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Tue, Apr 28 2009, 14:55 GMT
Technical analysis for EUR/USD, GBP/USD - Page 5 - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:07 GMT
Yellowlion's Daily EURUSD - Page 6 - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:07 GMT
Elliott charts with Grega H. - Page 2 - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:05 GMT
Technical analysis for EUR/USD by AceTrader - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:03 GMT
geithner, eurusd, china, gbpusd
View All
Outlook for the major currencies this week
Ian Copsey | Tue, Sep 30 2008, 08:00 GMT
FX Instructor Live Trading Room
Mark De La Paz | Tue, Sep 30 2008, 11:00 GMT 
FX Instructor Live Trading Room
Mark De La Paz | Wed, Oct 1 2008, 09:00 GMT
Weekly Webinar: 1st on Forex - The Week Ahead
Jerry Furst | Mon, Oct 6 2008, 16:00 GMT
Outlook for the major currencies this week
Ian Copsey | Tue, Oct 7 2008, 08:00 GMT
geithner, eurusd, china, gbpusd
View All