FXstreet.com

This report has been deactivated

0

0

Currencies and Cotton Candy Rate Cuts

Tue, Oct 14 2008, 14:53 GMT
by Jack Crooks

Money and Markets


I understand that the lending system is in bad shape. Or more specifically, that it's barely functioning at all. We're well past the point when central banks and governments around the globe inexplicitly declared it their duty to save their economies. But they really unleashed their helping hands this week.

That's especially true of the coordinated rate cuts from many of the world's Central Banks — everyone from the U.S. and Europe to China.

These moves have serious implications for all financial markets, but especially the currency markets. And today I want to tell you what I think is coming next.


Governments Make Bold Moves; Markets Shrug ...

Stocks started the week with a horrendous Monday that basically stated, "Bailout package? So what?"

Monday was followed by an equally bad Tuesday.

So the Federal Reserve, and every other central bank you may have ever heard of, did what many had been hoping they would do. They cut their benchmark interest rates.

But the markets continued falling. In short, Wednesday simply deflated any hopes of recovery to which a very small minority might have still been clinging.

Throughout recent weeks, Chairman Bernanke has guided billions of dollars of credit into money markets, supported the Treasury's $700-billion bailout plan, and taken steps to make accessing loans easier.

But until Wednesday, the Fed hadn't caved in to the newest pressures rocking the markets with official interest rate cuts. And surely to their disappointment, it's done little to better the current investment environment.

I Didn't Think the Federal Reserve Needed to Cut; Here's Why ...

Even though the Fed Funds target had been stable at around 2%, the market-determined rate was already far lower.

Plus, as I mentioned, the Fed had already created and used so many other methods of pumping liquidity into the system.

But the Fed did what it did, knocking another 50 basis points off an already measly 2% Fed Funds rate. But the Fed was only one guest at a rather big party that took place in the middle of the week:

  • The European Central Bank finally budged and knocked 50 basis points off its benchmark rate.
  • The Bank of England followed suit with 50 basis points.
  • The Swedish Riksbank cut by 50 basis points.
  • The Bank of Canada cut by 50 basis points.
  • The Swiss National Bank got in on the action by 50 basis points as well.
  • The Bank of China knocked rates down by 27 basis points.
  • The Bank of Japan offered their support, but made no change to rates.

Also note that a day before all these actions, the Reserve Bank of Australia sliced off 100 basis points. And a day after the rate cut party, central banks in Taiwan, South Korea and Hong Kong also joined in with rate cuts of their own.

When I say party, I mean it. Only investors never got the invitation to come share in the finger foods and free booze.

But at least the central banks were kind enough to toss some more easy money their way. After all ...

When Everyone's Already Heavily Indebted, What's Left to Do but Make Debt Cheaper for Them?

Here's the argument that central bankers and government officials make during crises like this:

  1.   Individuals, companies and banks are having trouble accessing credit.
  2.   This inability to secure credit is wreaking havoc on the growth of the economy.
  3.   By cutting interest rates, credit is made cheaper and encourages borrowing that will in turn stabilize growth.

Well, in reality, it's not quite that easy or obvious. The government's solution is a lot like a marathon runner fueling his body with cotton candy ...

The runner may get quite a burst of energy from the cotton candy at first, but, sooner or later, his sugar high is going to peak and subsequently collapse.

And in an effort to keep from losing his sugar high completely, the runner just takes in more and more cotton candy. The problem is the cotton candy intake becomes increasingly less effective ... to the point of becoming unhealthy.


A sugar high can only last so long before it becomes a massive crash!

How could allowing cheaper access to credit, at a time when it's "completely necessary" for the economy to function, become unhealthy for the economy?

My answer is that it's not completely necessary.

The problem, as many have already mentioned, is a lack of confidence in the lending system. To a much smaller extent is the problem actually due to a lack of credit.

Easy access to credit — unnecessarily low interest rates and a "loans-for-everyone" mentality among banks — is what created the bursting bubble we're dealing with right now.

Cheap money and easy access to loans have bred projects of low value and low profitability. If money was more difficult and costly to secure, these investments would have never happened in the first place.

Artificially low rates attract any ol' Joe Schmoe who's got a business idea — no matter if it's building birdhouses out of popsicle sticks or selling cell phones to scuba divers.

Market determined interest rates, however, naturally weed out the birth of wasteful and absurd projects. This kind of growth is far healthier and more sustainable.

Surprisingly (and fortunately!) quite a few parties are learning lessons from excessive intake of credit. They're not feeling so good anymore. And so they're not willing to swallow any more cotton candy credit, no matter how cheap and how easily accessible it becomes.

What needs to happen is a period of cleansing and consolidation. Particularly with the banks.

Everyone needs to know which banks are solvent and which ones are being held together with paper clips and chewing gum.

The collapsing banks will need to liquidate. The solvent banks will be able to buy up assets on the cheap and solidify their own business. The result is a healthier entity that's ready to run again.

The cotton candy credit being dished out is going to keep everything running a little while longer, sure. But that's only going to delay the inevitable collapse of troubled institutions. And it will fail to restore confidence that some banks, who will actually escape this mess, will be willing to lend and borrow between one another at healthy, responsible rates.

In the end, of course, central banks make these decisions, not me. So ...

What Do the Rate Cuts Mean for Currency Investors?

Like the $700-billion dollar bailout, these rate cuts aren't going to have an immediate effect on the lending system or on confidence in the market. Let's just keep our fingers crossed that they have a positive effect at all ... ever.

To the specific point I've mentioned plenty of times in the last couple months ... the Federal Reserve is ahead of the curve on interest rates. It seems likely to me that they have less distance to travel on the downside with policy rates.

Major central banks around the world, on the other hand, have quite a bit of room to play with. The potential for rates to drop a lot further in European and Antipodean countries will sustain the exchange-rate rebalance that's currently working to the advantage of the greenback.

The ECB just got started on this rate cut business ...

The BOE just resumed a much needed easing trend ...

The RBA has gotten the rate cut momentum moving quickly ...

And the RBNZ has set a comfortable pace for cutting rates that is far from coming to an end.

So if you're seeing Fed rate cuts and automatically thinking the U.S. dollar will fall, you might want to get your brain off cruise control!

There are too many other factors that are going to keep the rates vs. currency trend in the U.S. turned upside down.

Am I saying that the U.S. dollar is officially out of its bear market? No. But things have turned up for the buck, even though it's counterintuitive.

As I see it, now's the time for the rest of the major currencies to feel the pain. And it's time for the buck to lead the way out of this mess that's engulfed the world's financial system.

This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.

Weiss Research, Inc  | 15430 Endeavour Drive. Jupiter, FL 33478-6400 - USA
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com | eletter@moneyandmarkets.com

Legal disclaimer and risk disclosure

Money and Markets e-newsletter is published by Weiss Research, Inc. Weiss Research, Inc. is strictly a research publishing firm and does not provide individual investment advice to its subscribers. The information we publish is based on our opinions plus our statistical and financial data and independent research. Although we make every effort to provide the most accurate and updated information possible, our information cannot take into consideration your personal finances and goals, and therefore is not intended to be used as customized recommendation to buy, hold, or sell securities, or engage in any trading strategy. Such recommendations may only be made by a personal advisor or the broker you select. Most investments involve risk of loss. Although this service makes every effort to protect your principal, you can lose money. Therefore, it is not for all of your funds. If your goal for a certain portion of your funds is strictly capital preservation, we believe you should invest those funds in conservative investments such as short-term U.S. Treasury securities or equivalent. For more information on prudent investing, see also the information available at the websites of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority at www.finra.org. Most of the information we publish is derived from primary sources, including the U.S. government agencies as well as the financial institutions or publicly traded companies we cover. We believe our data sources are accurate, but we do not verify their accuracy independently. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the information is accurate or complete. Nor do we guarantee the success of any investment decision you may make using our data, information, or recommendations. To help us track the performance of this service, subscribers are asked to give their brokers’ permission to share statements with us strictly for the purpose of substantiating the results of the trading. If broker documents are available on a particular trade, we use them to calculate the net, after-commission profits on the trade. Naturally, the results of each subscriber may differ depending on the actual prices achieved and the commissions paid. If broker documents are not available on a trade, we estimate the pre-commission gains based on the market prices following the publication of each recommendation. In addition, examples of potential performance returns may sometimes be based on simulated — not actual — trades, assuming entry and exit prices that could have been obtained during regular market conditions. These entry and exit prices calculated do not reflect or include costs of spreads, market delays, or fees and commissions. Similar returns may or may not be actually achieved by subscribers. While every effort is made to evaluate the actual experience of subscribers, most performance figures must be considered hypothetical, and past results are no guarantee of future performance. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown. References to examples of past performance are not intended to provide a total picture of portfolio results. Your results may vary considerably depending on a series of factors, including: (a) when you begin or cease investing, (b) which recommendations you choose to act on, (c) how much money you choose to invest in each recommendation, (d) the specific prices you get, (e) the broker commissions you pay, (f) the interest income you earn on uninvested funds, and (g) the number and magnitude of losing or winning trades you experience. With the exception of exempt securities such as government securities and mutual funds, all Weiss Group, Inc. and Weiss Research, Inc. personnel are prohibited from purchasing any security or investment that is recommended in its publications, per the company’s Personal Securities Transaction (PST) policy. LIMITATION ON WEISS RESEARCH’S LIABILITY Weiss Research’s liability, whether in contract, tort, negligence, or otherwise, shall be limited in the aggregate to direct and actual damages not to exceed the fees received by Weiss from Subscriber. Weiss will not be liable for consequential, incidental, punitive, special, exemplary, or indirect damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon any material provided by Weiss. Without limitation, Weiss shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damages related to, either directly or indirectly, (1) any decline in market value or loss of any investment; (2) a subscriber’s inability to use or any delay in accessing the Weiss website or any other source of material provided by Weiss; (3) any absence of material on the Weiss website; (4) Weiss’ failure to deliver or delay in delivering any material or (5) any kind of error in transmission of material; or (6) the use by a subscriber of any research to invest in any way which may be deemed unsuitable in accordance with certain industry standards. Weiss and Subscriber acknowledge that, without limitation, the above-enumerated conditions cannot be the probable cause of any breach of any agreement between Weiss and Subscriber. "No-risk" and "risk-free" refer solely to the subscription price refund policy. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY ANY AND ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED BY WEISS IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WEISS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Related reports

Forex Daily Overview - USD mixed, unemployment rises to 10.2% by Easy Forex
Fri, Nov 6 2009, 18:31 GMT

Weekly Market Commentary - Fed, BOE and ECB kept rates on hold by Mizuho Corporate Bank
Fri, Nov 6 2009, 15:45 GMT

Friday Notes - The week of the central banks by UniCredit Group
Fri, Nov 6 2009, 12:23 GMT

Czech: CNB stays on hold despite dovish signal from its new forecast by KBC Bank
Fri, Nov 6 2009, 11:08 GMT

Market Session Recaps - London Session by FOREX.com
Fri, Nov 6 2009, 11:03 GMT

china, centralbanks, interestrate, bailout, markets, cotton

View All

Interested in forex trading? forex brokerage firms!


MG Financial Group
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
FOREX.com
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
Interbank FX, LLC
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
City Credit Capital (UK) Limited
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account
Saxo Bank A/S
Contact the broker/FDM
Open a demo account

GET CASH BACK FOR YOUR TRADES!   Learn more about the Pip Rebate Program

Note: All information on this page is subject to change. The use of this website constitutes acceptance of our user agreement. Please read our privacy policy and legal disclaimer.

Trading foreign exchange on margin carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The high degree of leverage can work against you as well as for you. Before deciding to trade foreign exchange you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. The possibility exists that you could sustain a loss of some or all of your initial investment and therefore you should not invest money that you cannot afford to lose. You should be aware of all the risks associated with foreign exchange trading and seek advice from an independent financial advisor if you have any doubts.

Opinions expressed at FXstreet.com are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of FXstreet.com or its management. FXstreet.com has not verified the accuracy or basis-in-fact of any claim or statement made by any independent author: errors and Omissions may occur.

Any opinions, news, research, analyses, prices or other information contained on this website, by FXstreet.com, its employees, partners or contributors, is provided as general market commentary and does not constitute investment advice. FXstreet.com will not accept liability for any loss or damage, including without limitation to, any loss of profit, which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

©2009 "FXstreet.com. The Forex Market" All Rights Reserved.