This report has been deactivated

19

0
A new president ... new ideas... and an old problem: How to pay for it all!
Tue, Nov 11 2008, 10:16 GMT
by Mike Larson
Money and Markets
It's been one heck of a week in American politics.
We have a new president-elect in Barack Obama ... a new approach to governing this country ... and lots of new ideas about how to get the economy off its back.
For instance, Obama has proposed investing billions of dollars on infrastructure —
- • New bridges,
- • Improved roads, and
- • Better schools.
But that could get darn expensive ... really fast.
In fact, the American Society of Civil Engineers estimates the U.S. would need to spend $1.6 TRILLION over five years to get the nation's infrastructure into ideal shape.
Obama is also considering a second economic stimulus package. The number being bandied about is $175 billion — including tax checks for Americans and a tax credit aimed at creating jobs.
Another proposal calls for spending $150 billion over 10 years to develop cleaner sources of energy, while still another is aimed at reforming the U.S. health care. The potential cost? As much as $65 billion a year.
Many of these new ideas have merit.
There's just one old problem: How the heck are we going to pay for it all?
Uncle Sam Is Tapped Out ...
What's the prudent way to manage your money?
Sock away funds during the good times so you have a cash "kitty" you can tap into when times get tough.
The same goes for governments.
Ideally, they run budget surpluses during the good times. Then when growth tanks, they can spend more — even run budget deficits for a while — to help rev up the economy again.
Unfortunately, we've been operating in the red for years on end — good economy OR bad. The last budget surplus was $127 billion in 2001. Since then, we have racked up a cumulative 2.1 TRILLION in budget deficits. That includes a record $455 billion in fiscal 2008 alone.
Moreover, there is no sign of ANY let up on the horizon.
Even BEFORE Obama was elected, and even BEFORE the total costs of the latest $700 billion banking bailout were taken into account, the administration was predicting a $482 billion deficit for fiscal 2009.
Now, with the costs of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) included, private analysts are estimating a budget deficit of as much as $1 TRILLION. And that number could ultimately prove too low depending on how many new programs make their way from the drawing board to the new President's desk.
The result:
Our Borrowing Needs Are Shooting Through The Roof!
The Treasury just announced that it will have to borrow an estimated $550 billion in the October-December quarter. That's almost FOUR TIMES what officials were projecting just a few months ago and MORE THAN DOUBLE what we borrowed in the first quarter of this year.
The Treasury will sell $25 billion in 3-year notes on November 10, the first time the government has sold debt with that maturity since May 2007. The sale will be followed by a $20 billion auction of 10-year notes a couple days later, and $10 billion in 30-year bonds the day after that.
But that's just a start!
Goldman Sachs estimates that the government will soon have to borrow TWO TRILLION DOLLARS — to finance the $850 billion federal deficit ... to buy $500 billion in bad assets ... and roll over $561 billion in maturing Treasuries securities ... plus more.
And we believe that as the U.S. economy sinks, and tax revenues fall, even that shocking estimate could prove to be too low.
Supply, Supply, Supply
You don't need a Ph.D. in economics to understand the law of supply and demand. If supply rises enough to overwhelm demand, prices fall. That's true for cars, houses AND ... U.S. Treasury bonds.
We have already seen long bond futures drop in price — from a high of 124 23/32 in mid-September to a recent low of 112 17/32. That's a decline of just over 12 points. Ten-year Treasury yields have jumped from a low of 3.39% to a recent high of 4.08%.
In the months ahead, we'll likely see more of the same. That's true no matter what the Federal Reserve does with the federal funds rate.
Remember: The Fed can only control very short-term rates directly — and even that process isn't always perfect, as we recently saw with LIBOR.
An Important Point to Remember ...
Long-term rates move up and down based on investor perceptions of bond supply, inflation, and credit risk. They are driven by the "buy" and "sell" decisions of millions of investors. And those "sell" tickets have been piling up on Wall Street and in the interest rate pits in Chicago.
So if you're shopping for a fixed-rate mortgage, lock in your rate now. And if you're invested in sectors vulnerable to rising long-term rates (housing, REITs, etc.), sell.
Or if you're more aggressive, consider hedging or profiting from rising long-term interest rates. There are mutual funds and ETFs that allow you to do so.
Published on
Tue, Nov 11 2008, 10:23 GMT
Weiss Research, Inc
| 15430 Endeavour Drive. Jupiter, FL 33478-6400 - USA
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com | eletter@moneyandmarkets.com
Legal disclaimer and risk disclosure
Money and Markets e-newsletter is published by Weiss Research, Inc. Weiss Research, Inc. is strictly a research publishing firm and does not provide individual investment advice to its subscribers. The information we publish is based on our opinions plus our statistical and financial data and independent research. Although we make every effort to provide the most accurate and updated information possible, our information cannot take into consideration your personal finances and goals, and therefore is not intended to be used as customized recommendation to buy, hold, or sell securities, or engage in any trading strategy. Such recommendations may only be made by a personal advisor or the broker you select.
Most investments involve risk of loss. Although this service makes every effort to protect your principal, you can lose money. Therefore, it is not for all of your funds. If your goal for a certain portion of your funds is strictly capital preservation, we believe you should invest those funds in conservative investments such as short-term U.S. Treasury securities or equivalent. For more information on prudent investing, see also the information available at the websites of the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority at www.finra.org.
Most of the information we publish is derived from primary sources, including the U.S. government agencies as well as the financial institutions or publicly traded companies we cover. We believe our data sources are accurate, but we do not verify their accuracy independently. Therefore, we cannot assure you that the information is accurate or complete. Nor do we guarantee the success of any investment decision you may make using our data, information, or recommendations.
To help us track the performance of this service, subscribers are asked to give their brokers’ permission to share statements with us strictly for the purpose of substantiating the results of the trading. If broker documents are available on a particular trade, we use them to calculate the net, after-commission profits on the trade. Naturally, the results of each subscriber may differ depending on the actual prices achieved and the commissions paid. If broker documents are not available on a trade, we estimate the pre-commission gains based on the market prices following the publication of each recommendation. In addition, examples of potential performance returns may sometimes be based on simulated — not actual — trades, assuming entry and exit prices that could have been obtained during regular market conditions. These entry and exit prices calculated do not reflect or include costs of spreads, market delays, or fees and commissions. Similar returns may or may not be actually achieved by subscribers.
While every effort is made to evaluate the actual experience of subscribers, most performance figures must be considered hypothetical, and past results are no guarantee of future performance. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations. Unlike an actual performance record, simulated results do not represent actual trading. Also, since the trades have not actually been executed, the results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity. Simulated trading programs in general are also subject to the fact that they are designed with the benefit of hindsight. No representation is being made that any account will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those shown.
References to examples of past performance are not intended to provide a total picture of portfolio results. Your results may vary considerably depending on a series of factors, including: (a) when you begin or cease investing, (b) which recommendations you choose to act on, (c) how much money you choose to invest in each recommendation, (d) the specific prices you get, (e) the broker commissions you pay, (f) the interest income you earn on uninvested funds, and (g) the number and magnitude of losing or winning trades you experience.
With the exception of exempt securities such as government securities and mutual funds, all Weiss Group, Inc. and Weiss Research, Inc. personnel are prohibited from purchasing any security or investment that is recommended in its publications, per the company’s Personal Securities Transaction (PST) policy.
LIMITATION ON WEISS RESEARCH’S LIABILITY
Weiss Research’s liability, whether in contract, tort, negligence, or otherwise, shall be limited in the aggregate to direct and actual damages not to exceed the fees received by Weiss from Subscriber. Weiss will not be liable for consequential, incidental, punitive, special, exemplary, or indirect damages resulting directly or indirectly from the use of or reliance upon any material provided by Weiss. Without limitation, Weiss shall not be responsible or liable for any loss or damages related to, either directly or indirectly, (1) any decline in market value or loss of any investment; (2) a subscriber’s inability to use or any delay in accessing the Weiss website or any other source of material provided by Weiss; (3) any absence of material on the Weiss website; (4) Weiss’ failure to deliver or delay in delivering any material or (5) any kind of error in transmission of material; or (6) the use by a subscriber of any research to invest in any way which may be deemed unsuitable in accordance with certain industry standards. Weiss and Subscriber acknowledge that, without limitation, the above-enumerated conditions cannot be the probable cause of any breach of any agreement between Weiss and Subscriber. "No-risk" and "risk-free" refer solely to the subscription price refund policy.
DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY
ANY AND ALL MATERIAL PROVIDED BY WEISS IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WEISS MAKES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Related reports
Weekly Focus - Is it strong enough? by Danske Bank A/S
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 15:00 GMT
Weekly Market Commentary - Libor and Official Interest rates are at their narrowest by Mizuho Corporate Bank
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 14:33 GMT
Your Summer Housing Market Update by Money and Markets
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 12:39 GMT
European Market Update - Spain June Services PMI: 41.2 v 39.1 prior by TradeTheNews.com
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 12:32 GMT
Friday Notes - W-shaped recovery increasingly probable by UniCredit Group
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 12:08 GMT
indicator, fed, obama, libor, eurusd, inflation, election, wallstreet, cpi, stocks
View All
Related content
European Markets mixed, EUR rises and GBP lower
FXstreet.com | Fri, Jul 3 2009, 14:38 GMT
Forex: EUR/USD rebounds at 1.3980, back above 1.4000
FXstreet.com | Fri, Jul 3 2009, 11:46 GMT
CURRENCIES: Dollar Edges Higher In Thin Trade Ahead Of Holiday
Dow Jones | Fri, Jul 3 2009, 11:46 GMT
2nd UPDATE: UK Service Sector Grows, End Of Recession Nears
Dow Jones | Fri, Jul 3 2009, 10:15 GMT
Asian Shares End Mostly Lower But Fare Better Than Wall St
Dow Jones | Fri, Jul 3 2009, 10:13 GMT
indicator, fed, obama, libor, eurusd, inflation, election, wallstreet, cpi, stocks
View All
Trading for a living » Triple top in cable at the european window
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 10:49 GMT
FX Market Readings » Wide range swing moves for week end
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 07:03 GMT
The Disciplined Trader » EUR and GBP at important junctures
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 07:00 GMT
The Disciplined Trader » Alternate counts on EUR and GBP
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 01:51 GMT
FX Market Readings » Important day of Events - expected moves
Fri, Jul 3 2009, 01:50 GMT
indicator, fed, obama, libor, eurusd, inflation, election, wallstreet, cpi, stocks
View All
Technical analysis for EUR/USD, GBP/USD - Page 5 - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:07 GMT
Yellowlion's Daily EURUSD - Page 6 - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:07 GMT
Elliott charts with Grega H. - Page 2 - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:05 GMT
Technical analysis for EUR/USD by AceTrader - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:03 GMT
The technical analysis of majors - Page 3 - Forex Forum - FXstreet.com
Fri, Oct 10 2008, 12:02 GMT
indicator, fed, obama, libor, eurusd, inflation, election, wallstreet, cpi, stocks
View All
Outlook for the major currencies this week
Ian Copsey | Tue, Sep 30 2008, 08:00 GMT
FX Instructor Live Trading Room
Mark De La Paz | Tue, Sep 30 2008, 11:00 GMT 
FX Instructor Live Trading Room
Mark De La Paz | Wed, Oct 1 2008, 09:00 GMT
SPECIAL EVENT: Trade Non-Farm Payrolls LIVE - 29th Edition
Wayne McDonell | Fri, Oct 3 2008, 11:30 GMT
Weekly Webinar: 1st on Forex - The Week Ahead
Jerry Furst | Mon, Oct 6 2008, 16:00 GMT
indicator, fed, obama, libor, eurusd, inflation, election, wallstreet, cpi, stocks
View All