Digital currencies are not a financial product and operators do not need licenses to trade or hold them, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has said.
Additionally, an operator does not require a license to provide advice to others in relation to digital currencies, or to arrange for others to buy and sell them.
ASIC's comments are contained within a 32-page submission (download the pdf here) to the ongoing Australian Senate inquiry into digital currency.
Like the Australian Tax Office's ruling in August, ASIC's submission is regarded as temporary until such time as the federal government is able to clarify the issue with formal legislation.
The commission is Australia's principle corporate regulator, tasked with protecting the interests of investors and financial consumers.
Businesses connecting digital currencies to the fiat world, or other legally defined financial products, will still require market or financial services licences.
The submission itself says: "If there is a delay between the entry of the agreement to sell and the delivery of the digital currency, the contract may be a derivative and the financial services and financial markets regimes would apply in the normal way".
Additionally, under a section titled 'Facilities that May Be Financial Products', the paper refers to payment processors exchanging digital currencies for 'monetary value'. Facilitation of such 'non-cash' payments may still require a financial services license.
In particular, it referred to CoinJar's 'Swipe' debit card system, with which customers can fund a dollar account directly from their bitcoin balance, using CoinJar's exchange, and then use the card like a traditional debit card.
Living Room of Satoshi, which processes bill payments via Australia's national electronic BPAY network, reopened just this week after shutting down in October due to tax issues.
ASIC said it has received an application for a financial services license from a bitcoin trading platform for its bitcoin escrow service (though not the exchange itself).
After deliberating, the regulator said the bitcoin escrow service may be technically a financial product, but eventually decided that it was not, and would not be subject to the financial services regulatory regime.
The commission further explained that this was because the service is a minor part of a wider unregulated business, and that requiring a license may lead consumers to assume the entire business was ASIC regulated.
The ASIC submission is one of 44 to date from various stakeholders in Australian business and economy.
As well as individuals and bitcoin companies, this list has included industry groups like the Australian Payments Clearing Association (APCA) and regulatory/enforcement bodies like Australian Federal Police, the Australian Taxation Office and the department of the Attorney-General.
Additionally, an operator does not require a license to provide advice to others in relation to digital currencies, or to arrange for others to buy and sell them.
ASIC's comments are contained within a 32-page submission (download the pdf here) to the ongoing Australian Senate inquiry into digital currency.
Like the Australian Tax Office's ruling in August, ASIC's submission is regarded as temporary until such time as the federal government is able to clarify the issue with formal legislation.
The commission is Australia's principle corporate regulator, tasked with protecting the interests of investors and financial consumers.
License may still be required
While, on the surface, this news might be cause of excitement to some in the bitcoin space, in reality the exact nature of a digital currency's business will determine whether licences are required.Businesses connecting digital currencies to the fiat world, or other legally defined financial products, will still require market or financial services licences.
The submission itself says: "If there is a delay between the entry of the agreement to sell and the delivery of the digital currency, the contract may be a derivative and the financial services and financial markets regimes would apply in the normal way".
Additionally, under a section titled 'Facilities that May Be Financial Products', the paper refers to payment processors exchanging digital currencies for 'monetary value'. Facilitation of such 'non-cash' payments may still require a financial services license.
Examples cited
ASIC singles out two prominent Australian bitcoin companies – CoinJar and Living Room of Satoshi – as examples of such services.In particular, it referred to CoinJar's 'Swipe' debit card system, with which customers can fund a dollar account directly from their bitcoin balance, using CoinJar's exchange, and then use the card like a traditional debit card.
Living Room of Satoshi, which processes bill payments via Australia's national electronic BPAY network, reopened just this week after shutting down in October due to tax issues.
ASIC said it has received an application for a financial services license from a bitcoin trading platform for its bitcoin escrow service (though not the exchange itself).
After deliberating, the regulator said the bitcoin escrow service may be technically a financial product, but eventually decided that it was not, and would not be subject to the financial services regulatory regime.
The commission further explained that this was because the service is a minor part of a wider unregulated business, and that requiring a license may lead consumers to assume the entire business was ASIC regulated.
The ASIC submission is one of 44 to date from various stakeholders in Australian business and economy.
As well as individuals and bitcoin companies, this list has included industry groups like the Australian Payments Clearing Association (APCA) and regulatory/enforcement bodies like Australian Federal Police, the Australian Taxation Office and the department of the Attorney-General.
Recommended Content
Editors’ Picks
AUD/USD jumps above 0.6500 after hot Australian CPI data
AUD/USD extended gains and recaptured 0.6500 in Asian trading, following the release of hotter-than-expected Australian inflation data. The Australian CPI rose 1% in QoQ in Q1 against 0.8% forecast, providing extra legs to the Australian Dollar upside.
USD/JPY hangs near 34-year high at 154.88 as intervention risks loom
USD/JPY is sitting at a multi-decade high of 154.88 reached on Tuesday. Traders refrain from placing fresh bets on the pair as Japan's FX intervention risks loom. Broad US Dollar weakness also caps the upside in the major. US Durable Goods data are next on tap.
Gold price cautious despite weaker US Dollar and falling US yields
Gold retreats modestly after failing to sustain gains despite fall in US Treasury yields, weaker US Dollar. XAU/USD struggles to capitalize following release of weaker-than-expected S&P Global PMIs, fueling speculation about potential Fed rate cuts.
Ethereum ETF issuers not giving up fight, expert says as Grayscale files S3 prospectus
Ethereum exchange-traded funds theme gained steam after the landmark approval of multiple BTC ETFs in January. However, the campaign for approval of this investment alternative continues, with evidence of ongoing back and forth between prospective issuers and the US SEC.
US versus the Eurozone: Inflation divergence causes monetary desynchronization
Historically there is a very close correlation between changes in US Treasury yields and German Bund yields. This is relevant at the current juncture, considering that the recent hawkish twist in the tone of the Fed might continue to push US long-term interest rates higher and put upward pressure on bond yields in the Eurozone.